1 2 3
ronholm
ronholm Reader
4/30/12 8:59 p.m.
That falls under the category of "ideas so brilliant and simple I can't berkeleying believe I never thought of it before."

+1

I have spent lots of time playing around trying to make a FWD setup work well in the rear of a car. Hopefully I will find out one day if my efforts paid off..

but b/t changing anti dive geometry, playing around with bumpsteer.. and all of the rest of it...

When talking about it.. the whole.. "lets just take a FWD subframe and mount it in the rear" sounds really good.. But SSSSSSOOOO many little things need to change or be made adjustable.....

poopshovel
poopshovel PowerDork
4/30/12 9:58 p.m.

Holy dead thread revival + facebook pimpin', batman!

I thought your car/theme was pretty cool before the message board whoring.

plance1
plance1 Dork
4/30/12 11:31 p.m.

http://www.ronsusser.com/inventory.htm?id=846

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/01/ebay-find-of-the-day-twin-engine-toronado/

B430
B430 New Reader
5/1/12 2:06 a.m.
donalson wrote: when someone mentions twin engine I have to double check aarons build progress http://www.aaronreedbaker.com/ratrod.html

I like this guys concept, but the execution is terrible, doesnt achieve the "cool" rat rod look, the plumbing just looks stupid, and what is up with the down pipe on the front motor?

1 2 3

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
eQhoU5vM1q0YgDV5byHMPzk7JFoipwQOaWpjenQFCi6vLmP7V5OUnU5HJkUBpWVb