In reply to ncjay:
No idea... I didn't build it. 
In reply to ncjay:
No idea... I didn't build it.
The_Jed wrote: Damn budget cuts!
Reminds me of this:
Just in case folks haven't heard yet:
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/sci-tech/irans-new-stealth-fighter-jet-under-fire-from-critics-20130207-2e08q.html
In reply to friedgreencorrado:
"See, my knees stick straight up like this...."
"...so they cannot reach the rudder peddles underneath the dash holding my sweet Alpine car stereo."
Ranger50 wrote: In reply to ncjay: No idea... I didn't build it.
Uggh, those Lexus coupes were so fugly and underwhelming, I can't imagine taking the effort to do that.
Anti-stance wrote:
The canopy is also made of a special composite material to enhance your nearsightedness.
Gasoline wrote:
Jesus Christ! A 47 Olds woodie!?!? I can't imagine the value of that if it were stock.
Not stock.
Nice pics Nymalo. I used to run a 96 with AMEC in the early 80s. Sometimes I miss it, then I think about laying on a frozen lake in two inches of very cold water trying to wrench on a car.
This is not my car, it's here to show what a 96 is.
Dan
157 hp. And that's a fact.
Woody wrote: 157 hp. And that's a fact.
Low compression cast pistons, no 4 bbl option, heads with tiny ports and valves and a constant leak from the 2-piece rear main seal. That being said I would still like to have one! 
The_Jed wrote:Woody wrote: 157 hp. And that's a fact.Low compression cast pistons, no 4 bbl option, heads with tiny ports and valves and a constant leak from the 2-piece rear main seal. That being said I would still like to have one!
I'd make some kind of Ford joke here, but I bought a 1982 Z28 with a 305 and 145 horsepower, so I'll just quietly slink off back to the early 80's.
In my defense, I did void the warranty within 3 months. Comp cam and Edelbrock intake took a full second off the quarter mile...down to a stellar 16.9.
Lord, I'm embarrassed.
Streetwiseguy wrote:The_Jed wrote:I'd make some kind of Ford joke here, but I bought a 1982 Z28 with a 305 and 145 horsepower, so I'll just quietly slink off back to the early 80's.Woody wrote: 157 hp. And that's a fact.Low compression cast pistons, no 4 bbl option, heads with tiny ports and valves and a constant leak from the 2-piece rear main seal. That being said I would still like to have one!
Half the displacement... Same power rating...
This just ain't right.
Maroon92 wrote:Streetwiseguy wrote:The_Jed wrote:I'd make some kind of Ford joke here, but I bought a 1982 Z28 with a 305 and 145 horsepower, so I'll just quietly slink off back to the early 80's.Woody wrote: 157 hp. And that's a fact.Low compression cast pistons, no 4 bbl option, heads with tiny ports and valves and a constant leak from the 2-piece rear main seal. That being said I would still like to have one!
110 HP
145 HP
175 HP
224 HP
You'll need to log in to post.
