TRoglodyte
TRoglodyte UltraDork
10/21/18 7:57 a.m.

HP 270 running windows 10, has 30 days McAfee livesafe antivirus. Should I get something more to keep the bugs out?

Knurled.
Knurled. GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/21/18 8:11 a.m.

Install an ad blocker.  Done.

Brian
Brian MegaDork
10/21/18 12:53 p.m.

AVG free was my go to. I also ran Spybot S&D. No idea what is “good” anymore. 

aircooled
aircooled MegaDork
10/21/18 1:20 p.m.

Microsoft Security Essentials is generally considered a good way to go.  Auto update, not intrusive.

Make sure the system updates run!! (set to auto)

Use Flash blocker or run Chrome (which doesn't allow Flash)

I use uBlock Origin to stop most scripts from running.  It's easy to disable if it causes issue (generally doesn't)

I believe most of the damaging attacks are done via email these days.

 - DON'T click on any links unless you are SUPER sure!

 - DON'T open attachements unless you are SUPER sure!

Make sure your passwords are good (especially on a primary email). Use two -factor authentication (e.g. send text to confirm PW change) when possible.

Knurled.
Knurled. GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/21/18 1:45 p.m.

Chrome is a huge security breach IMO, or at least it was the last time I'd used it (a bit before Win10 rolled out).  The way the ad blockers worked was a bit dumb.  With Firefox, the ads don't load.  With Chrome, the ads would load but not get displayed.  So if there were a malware infected ad, Chrome would happily load it and berk up your computer despite having "ad block".

 

 

BoxheadTim
BoxheadTim GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/21/18 1:54 p.m.

As aircooled mentioned, Microsoft Defender is definitely good enough in Win10 unless you need something that "graces" you with its presence more often than necessary. I do occasionally use Spybot S&D and Malwarebytes for extra checks, but that's not strictly necessary.

I tend to use EFF's Privacy Badger, uBlock Origin and on FF, Facebook Container to, well, contain Facebook.

californiamilleghia
californiamilleghia Reader
10/21/18 6:39 p.m.

I read that if you set up an administrator , and sign in as a user , then most of the attacks will not go thru as it says you do not have permission to add a program , 

anyone know how true that is ?

Knurled.
Knurled. GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/21/18 7:02 p.m.

In reply to californiamilleghia :

Exploits will steamroll right past that.

Stefan
Stefan GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/21/18 8:07 p.m.
californiamilleghia said:

I read that if you set up an administrator , and sign in as a user , then most of the attacks will not go thru as it says you do not have permission to add a program , 

anyone know how true that is ?

It helps prevent you or someone else from doing something stupid within your profile, but yeah the heavy duty exploits don’t even need someone logged on, just a PC available on the internet.

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/22/18 10:51 a.m.
californiamilleghia said:

I read that if you set up an administrator , and sign in as a user , then most of the attacks will not go thru as it says you do not have permission to add a program , 

anyone know how true that is ?

It can help to limit the damage when malware executes and is certainly a good idea, but it does nothing to prevent the initial infection. I set up my Windows computer like this - when I need to do something as admin, I just enter my admin username and password, similar to gksudo on Linux. Malware can't get past this limitation without a local privilege escalation exploit, but infecting one account is plenty enough for most malware.

Win10's built-in antivirus is plenty good enough, nothing more is needed.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
LJsf8LQ4OYxWAvrdCqteSKNqnthxuqwINtk9QTtVcAonkgRRa2kRGJTimzSBKhUu