What being on track can tell you that a dyno won’t

J.G.
Update by J.G. Pasterjak to the BMW 435i project car
Nov 11, 2024 | BMW, Track Night in America, BMW 435i

Sponsored by

Photography Credit: Paris Van Gorder

Dynamometers are great tuning and research tools, but they do have their limitations. The primary limiting factor of a dyno is that it’s static. It tests power at the wheels while all other parts of the car are static, which is a condition you’ll never experience on any track we’re aware of.

So you end up getting a highly repeatable picture …

This content is available for GRM+ members and Grassroots Motorsports magazine subscribers only.

You can read it for free in 125 days or subscribe to GRM+ to read right now.

Subscribe now

Already a member?

Login to read

Join Free Join our community to easily find more project updates.
More like this
Comments
ztnedman1
ztnedman1 Reader
9/27/24 8:53 a.m.

Eww canned tunes on track...yikes. I won't run them on the street. Typically just a throttle map and maybe an increase to load or boost targets. The worst of them removing the load based targets and just going boost.

 

A proper load based tune with more allowance for timing over boost should get better results with less heat. Add a gallon or two of E85 and then you may be able to do both.

 

If you do spike with some E85 you can bump up any of the pesky IAT/ignition modification tables. You'll get the power back. 

 

 

alfadriver
alfadriver MegaDork
9/27/24 9:06 a.m.

The steady state part of tuning is easy- making power is incredibly straight forward.  Can take time, depending on the number of variables that need to be dealt with, but it's not hard.

Most of the OEM calibration time is spent on starting and transients.  Heck, all of the many thousands of miles driven during development is about transients.  

Andy Hollis
Andy Hollis
9/27/24 11:51 a.m.

E85 is the way!

theruleslawyer
theruleslawyer Reader
9/27/24 11:55 a.m.

So did these tunes not make more power on the dyno as well? Or are you saying heat soak on the track just negates the gains? You mention that the n55 is already pretty maxed out. I'm sure the MHD claimed numbers are on the highest octane- 95/102 ron and cold car, ideal day. Dipping down to 93, especially on the track if going to lose you some power. I know my s55 was pretty sensitive to heat even on a stock tune. I could see the vmax difference on long straights at Road America and when I had to fill up with 91 instead of 93 the difference was noticeable, even on a stock tune for 91, let alone pushing the poor stock turbo so hard.

Looking at the MHD numbers stage 1 vs stage 2 is 30hp and assumes an upgrade intercooler. That might be a reasonable expectation and mostly due to the intercooler. I think the biggest take away here is that the car has inadequate cooling to support more power.

JG Pasterjak
JG Pasterjak Production/Art Director
9/27/24 12:09 p.m.
Andy Hollis said:

E85 is the way!

Not for Tuner it isn't :(

JG Pasterjak
JG Pasterjak Production/Art Director
9/27/24 12:14 p.m.
theruleslawyer said:

So did these tunes not make more power on the dyno as well? Or are you saying heat soak on the track just negates the gains? You mention that the n55 is already pretty maxed out. I'm sure the MHD claimed numbers are on the highest octane- 95/102 ron and cold car, ideal day. Dipping down to 93, especially on the track if going to lose you some power. I know my s55 was pretty sensitive to heat even on a stock tune. I could see the vmax difference on long straights at Road America and when I had to fill up with 91 instead of 93 the difference was noticeable, even on a stock tune for 91, let alone pushing the poor stock turbo so hard.

Looking at the MHD numbers stage 1 vs stage 2 is 30hp and assumes an upgrade intercooler. That might be a reasonable expectation and mostly due to the intercooler. I think the biggest take away here is that the car has inadequate cooling to support more power.

Yeah I think that's going to be our first target: getting IAT's down. I concur with zdnet's assessment of canned tunes, but this exercise ws all about finding hurdles before we put the time and expense into doing a custom tune, and those IATs are a big hurdle. I'd love to be able to fill the thing up with corn sauce, but the SCCA says no E85 in the TT Tuner division, so we're stuck with pump 93. Once we feel like the hard parts are squared away, though, BimmerWorld has a great tuner they work with and we'll get them logged in and working on our ones and zeros.

codrus (Forum Supporter)
codrus (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
9/27/24 12:27 p.m.
JG Pasterjak said:

Yeah I think that's going to be our first target: getting IAT's down. I concur with zdnet's assessment of canned tunes, but this exercise ws all about finding hurdles before we put the time and expense into doing a custom tune, and those IATs are a big hurdle. I'd love to be able to fill the thing up with corn sauce, but the SCCA says no E85 in the TT Tuner division, so we're stuck with pump 93. Once we feel like the hard parts are squared away, though, BimmerWorld has a great tuner they work with and we'll get them logged in and working on our ones and zeros.

Is that Epic Motorsports?

FWIW, I had great experiences using the canned Epic tune on my E46 M3 for several years.  I later had them do a custom remote tune which didn't change the peak power but did pick up about 10 ft-lbs of midrange torque.

...and then later I had them do another custom tune that took ~ 80 horsepower off the top end so that I could race it in NASA ST4. :)

 

Keith Tanner
Keith Tanner GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
9/27/24 12:41 p.m.

You can easily test intercooler capacity on the dyno - we saw the stock Mazdaspeed Miata drop 15 hp (IIRC) on back-to-back-to-back dyno runs as that factory IC heatsoaked. In fact, the dyno is GREAT for testing heat capacity simply because there is little cooling airflow.

In the article, you talked about the heat sink capacity of the intercooler. I don't think that's really what you're after - more heat capacity just gives you more time until the IC is heatsoaked. What you want is improved heat transfer from the IC to the air. That could be a more efficient core design (not necessarily heavier) or improved airflow. Just throwing a heavy IC in there for sheer mass  is not the right solution.

gearheadE30
gearheadE30 Dork
9/27/24 1:16 p.m.

Intercooler or airflow upgrades done right will probably help, but isn't that just a bandaid for a turbo that's now operating further and further out of its efficiency range? Great to be able to cool the charge before it hits the intake manifold, but you'll still be running very high exhaust manifold pressures, turbine inlet temperatures, compressor out temperatures, etc. Probably not an issue on the street, but for significant track use that stuff would be in the back of my head. 

The stock intercooler may be enough for a more appropriately sized turbo pushing a few more pounds of boost. At what point does it make sense to make that change first?

JG Pasterjak
JG Pasterjak Production/Art Director
9/27/24 1:24 p.m.
gearheadE30 said:

Intercooler or airflow upgrades done right will probably help, but isn't that just a bandaid for a turbo that's now operating further and further out of its efficiency range?

Yes.

Unfortunately, replacing the turbo would propel us into a TT division requiring sawzalls, and we really want to preserve the streetiness of this car as much as possible. So we're trying to find the most efficient band-aids possible at this point because the tiny little turbo on this thing is super efficient, but has very little headspace. We know that we're going to hit a hardcap on power pretty soon, but we're not there yet, so I think it's worth looking for what little low-hanging fruit remains.

You'll need to log in to post.

Sponsored by

GRM Ad Dept

Our Preferred Partners
zD8vH7YPEd1wuoWbgm3sjU1gskCRL4nHQO36YIcDDQa0Vn7sL9IXyunQpZopC2yO