Before we all descend into madness discussing the new M2’s looks, let’s talk numbers.
The all-new BMW M2 comes powered by a 3.0-liter, twin-turbo inline-six good for 453 horsepower at 6250 rpm and 406 lb.-ft. of torque at 2650-5870 rpm.
A six-speed manual comes standard, though buyers can opt for an eight-speed automatic.
Measuring in at roughly 180 inches long, …
I bet it is a hoot to drive!
Well the kidneys are smaller so that's cool. And the red is nice. Wait, do I spy box flares?!
It looks like a baby F06 6 series
What's not to like?
Kreb (Forum Supporter) said:What's not to like?
"the new M2 weighs in at 3814 pounds". 
It's basically as big or bigger than an e92 M3 in every dimension. Actually, it's almost as big as a new Mustang.
CAinCA said:Kreb (Forum Supporter) said:What's not to like?
"the new M2 weighs in at 3814 pounds".
It's basically as big or bigger than an e92 M3 in every dimension. Actually, it's almost as big as a new Mustang.
So, its a German Mustang GT.. Another one to watch out for at and cars and coffee events.
So it's under 4000lbs...
...until I get in the driver seat, lol.
One of the best looking cars BMW has put out in a decade or more. Liking the color too!
I actually like it.
Butnas mentioned, definitely put on a bit more than the freshman 15.
Yeah it's a heckuva car and I dig the flares, but it weighs more than an E39 M5
BlueInGreen - Jon said:So it's under 4000lbs...
...until I get in the driver seat, lol.
I'm right there with you brother.
At least they got the wheel arches right...
STM317 said:At least they got the wheel arches right...
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I think the flat front flare looks like a Nissan and not in a good way.
I do like box flares, and the grille is smaller than an M3/M4. So I guess that's nice...
I'd like to see it in another color. In different photos, the flares either look huge, or barely noticeable.
That is less than 200 lbs lighter than my cls550. I do like the looks of it!!!
I'm surprised it's "only" 453hp. I'm sure it's under rated and a tune adds 100hp but still
I'm surprised it's "only" 453hp. I'm sure it's under rated and a tune adds 100hp but still
CAinCA said:"the new M2 weighs in at 3814 pounds".
The curb weight of my 1961 Pontiac Bonneville was listed at 3810 pounds. I know modern cars are more 'dense' with crash protection, electronics, etc. but that's just crazy.
BlueInGreen - Jon said:So it's under 4000lbs...
...until I get in the driver seat, lol.
Same, and speaking of us... uh.. larger folks. If these are the only seats available:
...then that's gonna be a "no" from me, dawg.
The current lightest weight BMW M-car weights more than my 1972 El Camino. And it doesn't even have batteries to blame. Yikes.
Nose isn't nearly as hideous as the M3/4 but it's far from pleasing esthetically. 3800lbs is a huge porker. I'd still go with the last gen M2 comp
Love the looks!! Weight is crazy. Does indirect charge air cooling mean an air to liquid intercooler? Only newer BMW turbo motor I am somewhat familiar with is the 2.0 4 cylinder. Both of them we’ve had were air to air. Less post turbo plumbing volume decreases lag, but liquid to air adds even more weight...
I like the flare and general shape, but some of the details...yikes. Did they forget the grille mesh in the front openings? And the outboard rear openings/styling is a little too transformers/Civic Type R for my taste. But that's coming from someone who thinks the E46/E39 were where BMW peaked with styling:
Does it have a dipstick?
Will it drip oil on its serpentine belt out of the oil filter housing?
Will it force feed itself that belt through the front seal if it fails?
You'll need to log in to post.
