What would you take?
I'd go with the Supra if it's a TT, but would ditch the body kit and wheels. I've never been into the NSX.
The NSX. If it's good enough for Aryton Senna then it's good enough for me.
I've driven a Supra, it was meh. If I wanted a high HP inline 6 it would be in a GT-R.
Appleseed said:To own forever? The NSX.
To sell for stupid money and buy an NSX? The Supra
Strategery!
Appleseed said:To own forever? The NSX.
To sell for stupid money and buy an NSX? The Supra
Good point.
NSX all the way.
I have driven both.....NSX for sure. +2 to the above comments about sex and strategy, but NSX prices are going to rise a lot.
NoGuarantee said:In reply to Cotton :
It has a single turbo. I'm told it has 650hp.
Works for me. I owned an NA MKIV and it was too slow, but the turbos are very nice.
Another vote for the NSX, but if the FD is the one that I really would rather stare at. That car is just plain good looking IMHO.
NSX, no competition. I never understood the lust for the A80 Supras, the A70's I loved, especially the Group A racing version. In fact I like all the Supra's, including the BWM version except the A80 which just looks like a bar of soap left in water too long. No, I don't like the Ferrari 550 either, I prefer the 456.
Easy. The NSX. You can keep the jellybean with the handle on it. Anyone that has ever driven both will probably agree with me if they aren't straight line only types.
Now, if Toyota had styled the Supra like a Ferrari GTO, the choice would be much, much more difficult!
You'll need to log in to post.