integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/22/10 12:49 a.m.

Yet another car that has "popped up" on CL and caught my eye.

This car looks quite good for a 17 year old sedan, no visible body damage. And while $5000 is a bit steep sounding for a '93 Infiniti Q45....what are the things to look for on these cars?

NYG95GA
NYG95GA SuperDork
5/22/10 1:00 a.m.

5 G?

No way.

lewbud
lewbud Reader
5/22/10 2:56 a.m.

Can't tell you anything about the car other than it's overpriced, at least for the DFW area.

Feedyurhed
Feedyurhed HalfDork
5/22/10 6:33 a.m.

Holy moly.......it's already been 17 years since they came out!! Time sure does fly.

jrw1621
jrw1621 SuperDork
5/22/10 7:10 a.m.

^^^^^
The first Q's arrived in 1989 as 1990 models and therefore it has been 21 years.

patgizz
patgizz GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
5/22/10 7:15 a.m.

super clean retail is around 3 grand on NADA

if its a private seller the car is at least 3k overpriced.

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/22/10 12:50 p.m.

I realize $5K is a high asking price, I'm still kicking myself for passing up a 2nd gen with under 100K miles for $7K....but this car is so different looking, compared to what's out there now.

I was hoping for advice on what to look for/find, to get the price rolling downwards. A transmission that dies after 100K miles? A power steering pump that "moos" but still functions perfectly with high miles? Heck, window seals that don't? Nissan/Infiniti "gurus", help me out here. What fails (prematurely?) on these beauties?

Junkyard_Dog
Junkyard_Dog HalfDork
5/22/10 1:25 p.m.

Early Q timing chains ate themselves iirc, but I've never owned one myself.

MCarp22
MCarp22 Reader
5/22/10 2:50 p.m.

This is what the Q45 is for:

http://vimeo.com/5282678

belteshazzar
belteshazzar SuperDork
5/22/10 3:10 p.m.

it's really not an absurd price. Any really nice car seems to be worth that much around here. I've always wanted a nice Q, can never find one when I need one. Wound up with my P71 last time I was tryin.

jrw1621
jrw1621 SuperDork
5/22/10 3:18 p.m.
Junkyard_Dog wrote: Early Q timing chains ate themselves iirc, but I've never owned one myself.

I too have never owned one but always found them interesting. I believe that the chain issue had to do with 90-93 models wearing out chain guides which were plastic; later changed to metal.
Taken from Wiki:

Metal-backed camshaft timing chain guides were added in 1994 to replace the earlier model's less reliable plastic guides.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infiniti_Q45

More info about the car would help in establishing value, specifically, how many miles and how much documented repair work had been performed? (ie: tires are all new, shocks are all new, etc)

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/22/10 11:26 p.m.

I haven't actually gone to see this car in person, yet, so I can't provide much more info than what is in the CL ad....which, as usual, is almost nothing.

It's a '93 Q45, painted that pale yellow color Infiniti used for Qs for the first couple of years. The front and passenger side pix show a fairly straight car (yeah, I know, pix on the internet are very deceptive), no mention of miles.

If I remember correctly, there were almost no options on these cars, they were all sold "loaded" so I'm guessing tan leather seats and a sunroof.

BTW, I only thought of this car because of it's looks and it's fairly rare to find one now. That, AND, I figured if I was even considering P71s...this was worth considering. Am I foolish to think it would be more reliable than a similar year/priced BMW 5 or 7 series with a V8?

I once owned a 280Z and later a G20...Nissan dealers (I don't know about Infiniti dealers) do a very good job of keeping parts on hand or at least 2 days away by FedEx.

bluesideup
bluesideup New Reader
5/23/10 1:05 a.m.

The only options I remember were the Q45a Active suspension cars and the Q45t Touring cars. Active suspension is probably not that cool now and Touring is a rear spoiler coupled with mesh wheels.

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/23/10 6:37 a.m.

This car isn't a Q45t....sure hope it doesn't have the Active Suspension, either.

internetautomart
internetautomart SuperDork
5/23/10 8:44 a.m.

"t" infiniti models got VLSD, suspension tweaks too.
Q45s also got VTCs which can have their own sets of issues if not properly maintained.
5k for a 93 is way overpriced IMO.

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/23/10 9:53 a.m.

Well, I went on CL this morning and searched "Q45" in my area. I found about 6 or 7 local ads including one for a '94 in which they were asking $4K. I also (finally) went on Edmunds.com to do a bit of (overdue?) research on the Q. Of the 6 comments left (none newer than 2006) 2 or 3 mentioned the transmission as being on the weak side (but, apparently, it's shared with the Pathfinder....so a newer one is plentiful, when needed) along with the power accessories (windows/door locks). All Infinitis were fairly well regarded, with my fav, the G20 getting top honors.

TreoWayne
TreoWayne New Reader
5/24/10 3:38 p.m.

Way overpriced. More reliable than a M-B or a BMW but not as reliable as a similar-era Lexus LS400 which is the car you should be looking for IMO.

pinchvalve
pinchvalve GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
5/24/10 3:43 p.m.

I didn't even realize that the Q had been dropped from the lineup. I guess that shows how many they sold of the last generation.

Oh, that's why.

Ian F
Ian F Dork
5/24/10 3:55 p.m.

Wow... that thing is all sorts of ugly... I don't recall ever seeing one...

I did recently see a 1st gen over the w/e... and it did strike me that they aren't all that common. Old LS400's, however.... I see those every day...

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
5/24/10 11:31 p.m.

I think LS400s look "so common" because they A.) look so much like an older "S" class M-B and B.) they sold a lot of them and made almost no detectable styling changes for a long time.

And I have thought of the LS as an alternative to the Q. But I wanted something different, and until I REALLY started looking, I just assumed the LS was out of my budget.

racerdave600
racerdave600 Reader
5/25/10 8:08 a.m.

Well I did own a Q, a '94 model and it was an awesome car. I had it for a couple of years and never replaced anything. It was one of the best cars I've ever owned. I bought it at around 80k miles I think, and drove it until about 120k. Fast (150mph), quiet, decent handling (light years better than the LS400), and the absolute best cruise control I've ever experienced. It comes with a complete set of maintenance manuals with excellent wiring diagrams from the factory, and even things like the window switches can store codes to help diagnose them should you need to. I never did though. It's a big step up in quality from the average Maxima.

The problem now is finding a good one. They've been cheap for quite a while and poor maintenance and parking practices have taken their toll. 5k for a nice one wouldn't be out of line. Mine had a window sticker of $51,000 in '94 (sticker was still in the car), so $5k is a steal for a nice one.

aussiesmg
aussiesmg SuperDork
5/25/10 10:05 a.m.

My 97 Supercharged HSE Range rover stickered at around $100K, I paid $3K, all cars go down in value and known problems accelerate that rate.

racerdave600
racerdave600 Reader
5/25/10 3:39 p.m.

Yeah but Range Rovers come from the factory with smoke coming out of the tailgate! Ask me how I know! Just kidding, but I understand about depreciation. My point was that it is a lot of car now for the money, and $5k is not out of line if you can find a nice one. A worn out car at $3k is poor poor substitute for a nice one at $5k.

81gtv6
81gtv6 GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
5/26/10 8:36 a.m.

^ Do you use diesel in the outboard on your canoe?

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
RmlOMyrFlqpVbtLkMio5vDeqRZzFZl3jFJbQKWdbM2GVR8aVhVgi9Fuoc1wfOJX0