Knurled. said:
If automatics are so bad, then how easy/expensive is it to change the manual trans on a regular basis because crashing synchros is preferable to trying to push a clutch down?
edit - Yeah I'm salty over the idea that you aren't allowed to be an auto enthusiast unless you have a full range of motion over all four limbs
So let's get off our high horse and talk about the numbers...
The automatic is a $750, and $1,100 dollar option in the Toyota 86 and Subaru BRZ respectively. Included in this, is the older 200 horsepower engine with the old intake manifold, and engine calibration. Additionally, you are only given the less sought after 4.1 FD as opposed the the 4.3 FD. Here's how it affects performance (source C&D instrumented testing):
-The automatic 86 weighs ~57 lbs more than the manual version. In a car that weighs 2,700 lbs, that is a decent increase.
-The automatic is a staggering 1.5 seconds slower from 0-60 than the manual (6.2 seconds vs. 7.7 seconds)
-Braking performance increases 4 ft compared to the manual (70-0 mph)
-The automatic 86 traps 4 mph slower than the manual in the standing 1/4 mile
-The automatic 86 is 1.3 seconds slower than the manual in the standing 1/4 mile
-The automatic 86 reported a .01 G deficit compared to the manual
To recap:
So what do you get for your $1,000+? You get a demonstrably worse vehicle. You get an inferior engine, you get miles worse straightline performance, you get lower resale, you get higher vehicle weigh, and you get worse braking. I'm not telling people to stop buying automatics, I'm telling people to stop buying the GT86 in automatic.
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15088907/2017-toyota-86-automatic-test-review/
Source: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15099022/2017-subaru-brz-manual-test-review/