At some point, it far less expensive to lose a pound from the rider than the bike frame.
Not sure which piece his legs are in.
Ooooh, damn, I have a friend with one that looks just like that (or what that one looked like a few hours before that picture was taken):
Otto Maddox wrote: It's almost always far less expensive to lose a pound from the rider than the bike frame.
FTFY
Today in 1968: The U.S. Air Force deployed its new F-4E with an internal gun to Southeast Asia. The 40th Tactical Fighter Squadron sent 20 F-4Es to Korat Royal Thai AFB, where the squadron became the 469th Tactical Fighter Squadron
These guys had them the whole time.
fastEddie wrote: Today in 1968: The U.S. Air Force deployed its new F-4E with an internal gun to Southeast Asia. The 40th Tactical Fighter Squadron sent 20 F-4Es to Korat Royal Thai AFB, where the squadron became the 469th Tactical Fighter Squadron
I never understood why the F4 didn't have a gun until later. What kind of fighter plane doesn't have a gun?!
Meanwhile, the A-10 has a 30mm death machine that rips tanks apart.
Hotlink: Sorry about the language...
ultraclyde wrote:Otto Maddox wrote: It's almost always far less expensive to lose a pound from the rider than the bike frame.FTFY
But my bike doesn't get cravings for the carne asada torta at my BIL's restaurant...
Conquest351 wrote: I never understood why the F4 didn't have a gun until later. What kind of fighter plane doesn't have a gun?!
Because it was designed to be a (then) modern long ranger fighter/interceptor/bomber and the thought was guns were so WWII. The MiGs had different ideas though...
Anyone else remember when the Blue Angels used Phantoms? That's a lot of plane to be honking around like that.
a really early Blue Angel
An introductory lesson for "There, I fixed it."
Don't forget the Thunderbirds.
Wing Walk maneuver
You'll need to log in to post.
