neon4891 wrote:
Appleseed wrote:
What engine is that? I want to say SBC, but the distributor is up front...
No man with a good car needs to be justified. That's a Chrysler 440 6-Pack.
Wang-a ding-dang my dang-a-long ding-dong.
(Edited for double link)
Not even a broken tail light?
In reply to 4cylndrfury:
I think he's pointing out that the action-figure is not anatomically correct. At least that's how I read it.
oldsaw
SuperDork
8/24/10 7:55 a.m.
In reply to racerfink:
That pic can be interpreted any number of ways, which is why it was hotlinked.
I tend to think a more "correct" version should have removable attachments so it can be adapated for political expediency.
DukeOfUndersteer wrote:
totally awesome!
Awesome. The only way to improve this is to put a kayak on the roof.
How would you mount the roof rack?
Powar
Dork
8/24/10 9:39 a.m.
friedgreencorrado wrote:
Powar, post up pix of the real one.
Mmmmkay.
friedgreencorrado wrote: Still haven't found my own pix of Jack's IT car back in the day (Google sez it was on pg 206 or so when we were talking about it), otherwise I'd post that up instead.
The more I think about it, the more I reallllly would love to have Jack's car. I wonder if he'll ever part with it.
I'm all for Supercars with roof racks...
Today's funny from the shop: "they started making noise a few days ago"
In reply to ansonivan:
Wow! Some people...
Mandatory Hotlink: Priaja...
Oddly enough, neither car is made less desirable because of this.
DukeOfUndersteer wrote:
I'm writing blurbs for UTCC coverage, and this pops into my head for NO apparent reason. I mean, I can't even remember the last time I even heard this song.
Woody wrote:
Oddly enough, neither car is made less desirable because of this.
DukeOfUndersteer wrote:
Another instance where people were asking whether or not they could, without asking whether or not they should...
and the hotlink: