The Exomotive Exocet is the second coming of the Lotus Seven. Surprised? So were we, at least when we first wrote it down on paper. Those are big shoes to fill, but the Exocet’s simple construction, low cost, and common drivetrain make it so.
Lotus Sevens, still sold under the Caterham name today, were created to go fast for little …
Hey look at that! Exocet has managed to do a copy of the Lotus 7, Super 7, Chaterham 7, etc.
Not that that's a bad thing!! Actually the Miata, especially the NA and NB are as close to what Lotus used to do everyady as you'll find anywhere. So the Miata motor is a natural!!! Why anyone would ever destroy either a Miata or a Exocet with yet another Chevy based cast-iron pushrod valved boat anchor is beyond me!!!
My last ever Chevy, much less US built V-8 was in my newly bought 1970 El Camino SS. After less than a mile driving a Europa and about the same distance driving a 240Z proved to me, I really didn't want to return to the age of dinasours!! I sold that absoultely perfect conditioned less than 10,000 mile El Camino at a loss of $1,500 and felt I got out cheap!! Remember, this was 1971 and the El Camino cost me less than $3,800 brand new. So a $1,500 dollar loss on a less than 10,000 mile six months old vehicle was almost half the cost of the ride.
I have driven several Chevys since. Including a Gen 3 Corvette which I was offered to drive for free as a 100% paid racing sponsorship. I said "Thank you very much! I'd rather spend my own money and drive a car I enjoy!"
The favorite car I ever drove RW was a Twin-Cam Europa! I had a JPS on order with half the full retail price paid cash in advance. The only reason I never owned that car is because the S.O.B. running the store in Cincinnati sold it between Tuesday when he told me it was in and Saturday before I could come and pick it up!!
Mixed emotions!!?? Huge!! 1. At that point in time I lusted after that Europa more than any other I had ever driven to that time. 2. Having said that. Since my JPS Europa was sold without my chance to pick it up. I discovered the '71 Datsun 240Z which cost almost the same amount and served me well for over 25 years and then I sold it for about twice what it cost me new. And I've regretted the sale of that Z car pretty much every day since it happened!!
TBTG: I now have a supercharged 2002 NB Miata which I took on an over 6,000 mile road trip this Spring, blew off more than one "pretender" driver, and had Zero Issues! How many sixteen year old 1,800cc sports cars with over 218 horsepower at the rear wheels would you, or I, trust for that same trip??
Rupert
FM + LS3 + EXOCET, I can only dream of such a machine.
Does a 1700-pound autocross car need this much power? Probably not-we actually turned slower times than we managed in the well-sorted turbo car. In our opinion, the value here lies in the car’s wow factor, and in its ability to emit giant clouds of tire smoke in any gear and at any speed. V8s are fun, and this is about as close as you can get to riding one like a jockey.
This is the crux of the matter. Wants versus needs. Be aware of which you are building for, and you will be happy with the results.
I note the use of the word "Fear" when it came time to describe the XXXocet.
NOHOME said:Does a 1700-pound autocross car need this much power? Probably not-we actually turned slower times than we managed in the well-sorted turbo car. In our opinion, the value here lies in the car’s wow factor, and in its ability to emit giant clouds of tire smoke in any gear and at any speed. V8s are fun, and this is about as close as you can get to riding one like a jockey.
This is the crux of the matter. Wants versus needs. Be aware of which you are building for, and you will be happy with the results.
I note the use of the word "Fear" when it came time to describe the XXXocet.
I have to agree, I've driven ridiculously powered cars that can't put the power down.
It's fun for a few, but then gets old very quickly.
I'd like to see a greater percentage of the weight on the rear if you're going to try and harness V8 power levels. It'd also be interesting to compare a Catfish versus a similarly powered Exocet at the track and thereby see what the aerodynamic penalty is.
Rupert wrote:Why anyone would ever destroy either a Miata or a Exocet with yet another Chevy based cast-iron pushrod valved boat anchor is beyond me!!!
Surely you realize the miata motor is cast-iron, and the Chevy is all aluminum.
Surely.
Blaise said:Rupert wrote:Why anyone would ever destroy either a Miata or a Exocet with yet another Chevy based cast-iron pushrod valved boat anchor is beyond me!!!
Surely you realize the miata motor is cast-iron, and the Chevy is all aluminum.
Surely.
Sounds like the wine-and-cheese m.net crowd.
The big V8 power is something I've seen in Roadkill's Vette Kart. It also has the ability to melt tires at will but is nearly useless in the corners because of lack of grip.
I'd like to see lap times compared with all of these against a stock build Exocet and a stock Miata.
I used to have a StalkerV6 (slightly upsized Lotus 7 clone). They started off with the 2.8/3.4 liter Chevy 60 degree pushrod motors, which were plenty fast - until they started puting supercharged 3.8s in them, which were plenty fast - until they started puting LSXs in them. The bigger motors were faster, but took more skill to extract the speed from. At first they were actually slower on an autocross course. The extra power was more useful on a road course because you needed it to overcome the aerodynamic penalty.
That's why I'd like to see the Catfish V Exocet road course comparison. At speed, aero is so important. Hell, Lotus 11s were hitting 140 at road courses with little pushrod iron motors. The same mill in a 7 would probably be lucky to break 100.
So why the V8 if they're only significantly faster under specific conditions? Fun. Bragging rights. Duh.
Blaise wrote:Rupert wrote:Why anyone would ever destroy either a Miata or a Exocet with yet another Chevy based cast-iron pushrod valved boat anchor is beyond me!!!
Surely you realize the miata motor is cast-iron, and the Chevy is all aluminum.
Surely.
As of when? Although I'm surely a lot older than you, I never driven or to my knowledge even seen an aluminum Chevy block. It's obviously not stock!!
Rupert
In reply to Rupert :
As of 1996, the LS series V8 engine used in the Corvette and then the 1998 Camaro have been all aluminum. You can read about it here. As of now, even the truck engines are all aluminum. With the exception of diesels, I don't think GM actually has ANY iron block engines in production.
Yeah, we've only had production aluminum small block Chevy engines for a couple decades now. Word might get out soon, and then people are going to want to swap them into all sorts of things 
It's too bad that the build quality didn't get mentioned in the article, as I know it was a talking point at the time of the test a couple of years ago. The XXXocet also needs a little more room to play than an autocross course - and everyone involved in the build knew that it was ridiculous.
Equating the Lotus 7 and the Exocet isn't really fair. I've driven both (and homebuilt Locosts, and Westfields), and the 7 is the byproduct of a different time. The difference in strength, rigidity and occupant protection is huge - although the Exocet does weigh about 200 lbs more when you're comparing like to like. You can also put a modern scale human being wearing actual shoes into an Exocet.
Here's an Exocet frame beside a current Westfield frame. Yes, the floors are level with each other.
True, the Exocet is a much more evolved beast, but they are still spiritual brethren, and my points about weight distribution and aerodynamics apply to both -In fact, the Exocet is probably worse in both those areas.
Holy Tar that hp/lb ration on the XP-5.
ON 205 section TIRES> You are all literally insane.
The Exocet has more front weight than a Seven because the engine isn't as far back - it inherits the engine location from the Miata. My Locost had a slight rear weight bias with a driver, the Exocet does not. I haven't checked aero, they're both pretty awful. They do feel quite different to drive.
Exocets are considerably faster than Miatas with the same drivetrain. The most noticeable difference is in braking points. On a fast track, the V8 power will help overcome the crap aero. On a tight track with equivalent chassis setup, I doubt there's going to be much difference. We're about to starting building a performance-based LS3 Exocet for a customer, it'll be fun to set that car up.
Rupert said:Blaise wrote:Rupert wrote:Why anyone would ever destroy either a Miata or a Exocet with yet another Chevy based cast-iron pushrod valved boat anchor is beyond me!!!
Surely you realize the miata motor is cast-iron, and the Chevy is all aluminum.
Surely.As of when? Although I'm surely a lot older than you, I never driven or to my knowledge even seen an aluminum Chevy block. It's obviously not stock!!
Rupert
As of 1997. So that would make it 20 years now!!!
Keith, can you comment a bit more on the 'crap aero'? Is the Exocet worse that a Miata in that regard?
Yes. Exposed wheels are really bad aerodynamically. Exposed tubes are really bad aerodynamically. And an Exocet basically consists of exposed wheels and exposed tubes
Keith Tanner said:Yes. Exposed wheels are really bad aerodynamically. Exposed tubes are really bad aerodynamically. And an Exocet basically consists of exposed wheels and exposed tubes
I can comment even further. Here's a video of yours truly and a mechanically identical Exocet (stock 1.6). On a long straight, I'd fly past him. On a low-speed steep climb (hello Watkins Glen!), it'd be the opposite. Made for incredible fun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2uc0uJhxJM&
A moderately-powered Exocar or Locost is like a chameleon. A supercar from 0 to 60, a Boxter from 60 to 90, and a NA Miata from 90 to 120 (If you can make it that far).
Hmmm.
So for the guy trying to move to a track car that won't be so horribly outclassed on the straights as my stock drivetrain E30 the Exocet (normal, non-megapower version) isn't going to be much different? Disappointing.
ddavidv said:Hmmm.
So for the guy trying to move to a track car that won't be so horribly outclassed on the straights as my stock drivetrain E30 the Exocet (normal, non-megapower version) isn't going to be much different? Disappointing.
Correct. If you watch the vid, you can see that there's a pretty big aero hit.
That being said, its a ~90whp 1.6. With a 160whp+ setup, it would be quite diff.
In reply to ddavidv :
Exomotive is a pretty impressive company. They also offer the DBR1 kit which while more expensive gives you a much more slippery body. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they were also working on a more modern body to fit on top - something like a front-engined 818 or a Catfish. Speaking of which, have you looked into that product?
The DBR1 is from Stuart Mills in the UK, who did the original Exocet design. Exomotive had Warren redesign the Exocet chassis for US production and ended up with a much improved product. Warren also redesigned the body. I don't believe Exomotive is working on new skins for the Exocet at the moment.
You'll need to log in to post.
