"Performance goodies" that produced a whopping 180-220hp...from 400 cubic inches of displacement, lol.
Nice color, and I always liked the styling of that generation, but sometimes the good ol' days weren't really all that good from a performance standpoint.
Someone will pay the Nostalgia Premium for it, though, and there's nothing wrong with that.
When I picture second-gen Trans-Am, yeah, this might be the one.
And you forgot how different things were back then. This car, for the day, was a beast.
wspohn
UltraDork
12/9/24 11:02 a.m.
Doesn't look bad, but the previous poster is right - it was a sad time for muscle cars. I get double that horsepower from my lightly modded 2.0 4 cylinder daily driver (also a Pontiac as it happens).
Always love the dash face treatment in these, too. I’ll pull the front plate, though. I get it, it’s a Trans Am.
In reply to David S. Wallens :
Well, I'm going to politely disagree by saying no, I didn't forget.
Almost nothing mass produced by the big 3 was a beast during The Malaise Era. It was the first era where the current vehicles performed objectively worse than those of the prior era. At best, a person alive at the time could argue that they were "less slow" than the then-current offerings.
220 wheezing hp (at best) from a 6.6L motor provides a good example for why so many of us flocked to the import market.
It remains what it was: a nice cruiser.
Puddy46
HalfDork
12/9/24 11:47 a.m.
Horsepower numbers be damned, I'd still rock it eight ways from Sunday. Great, unique color just ups it's cool factor.
It certainly wouldn't be difficult to fix the horsepower output on that engine to get performance to match the looks.
I stand by my “beast” comment.
Proof?
Here. :)
My friend had that car in that color in high school. I always thought that was the best color for a TA.
We discussed the Sundance Yellow Trans Am plus some other unconventional colorways a little while back but, yeah, I could easily rock the triple blue.