Room for Improvement

Steve
Update by Steve Chryssos to the Chevrolet Camaro project car
Sep 17, 2010

Sponsored by

This well-known Camaro has long been complete, and now it deserves some upgrades.

Hotrods are finding their way to autocross and road course events with greater frequency.

The trick bits and pieces are all here. Let's make them work together more efficiently and effectively.

After eight years of reliable, high-rpm use, the 406 is opened up for diagnosis.

Here's the culprit: a failed hydraulic roller lifter.

Schrapnel sure sounds like a German word

Schrapnel sure sounds like a German word. Turns out Henry Shrapnel was the British inventor of the Shrapnel Shell, a hollow cannonball filled with shot that would burst in midair.

Check out the image of my Crower hydraulic roller lifter. You’ll note that some important fragments are missing. Those pieces are now buried deep in the engine.

There’s only one right way to handle this: The engine needs to come out so that we can gain access to the crap hiding in the Canton road race oil pan. Some people may have blindly installed a new roller lifter pair and hoped for the best, but that would almost definitely lead to catastrophic engine failure.

The big question is: Should this engine be reinstalled after freshening? It’s a great powerplant based on a high-nickel-content 1971 400 block with Milodon billet main caps, a Scat 4130 forged crank, Manley rods, a JE/SRP piston, ported cast iron World Products Sportsman II heads with Manley Pro Flo valves, an Edelbrock Victor Jr. intake manifold, and a hand-built, custom-calibrated Holley carburetor. It also features 10.5:1 compression and a Crower 236 duration hydraulic roller cam. Output is reasonably estimated at 1.2 horsepower per cube—a total of 480 ponies. It’s a great engine. The alternative is an “undesirable” and therefore affordable 5.3-liter LS engine with just enough boost to yield 550 horsepower.

Let’s hear some feedback: Gen 1 406 rebuild or boosted junkyard 5.3?

Join Free Join our community to easily find more project updates.
Comments
pinchvalve
pinchvalve GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
9/17/10 1:30 p.m.

That will totally buff out!

pilotbraden
pilotbraden SuperDork
9/17/10 1:30 p.m.

400

HiTempguy
HiTempguy UberDork
9/17/10 1:33 p.m.

406 rebuild, MOAR compression! Let that big SBC cackle. Boost is the new fad = lame. And cast iron heads? That is sooooo early millenium!

bravenrace
bravenrace MegaDork
9/17/10 1:41 p.m.

I'd say you really need to pull the engine to see what damage has been done. That may answer the question for you. But if it's repairable, I vote to rebuild it and put it back in.

klipless
klipless Reader
9/17/10 2:15 p.m.

Give it da boooost!

Steve Chryssos
Steve Chryssos Reader
9/17/10 2:20 p.m.

Schrapnel sure sounds like a German word. Turns out Henry Shrapnel was the British inventor of the Shrapnel Shell, a hollow cannonball filled with shot that would burst in midair.

Check out the image of my Crower hydraulic roller lifter. You'll note that some important fragments are missing. Those pieces are now buried deep in the engine.

There's only one right way to handle this: The engine needs to come out so that we can gain access to the crap hiding in the Canton road race oil pan. Some people may have blindly installed a new roller lifter pair and hoped for the best, but that would almost definitely lead to catastrophic engine failure.

The big question is: Should this engine be reinstalled after freshening? It's a great powerplant based on a high-nickel-content 1971 400 block with Milodon billet main caps, a Scat 4130 forged crank, Manley rods, a JE/SRP piston, ported cast iron World Products Sportsman II heads with Manley Pro Flo valves, an Edelbrock Victor Jr. intake manifold, and a hand-built, custom-calibrated Holley carburetor. It also features 10.5:1 compression and a Crower 236 duration hydraulic roller cam. Output is reasonably estimated at 1.2 horsepower per cube--a total of 480 ponies. It's a great engine. The alternative is an "undesirable" and therefore affordable 5.3-liter LS engine with just enough boost to yield 550 horsepower.

Let's hear some feedback: Gen 1 406 rebuild or boosted junkyard 5.3?

Steve Chryssos
Steve Chryssos Reader
9/17/10 2:39 p.m.

I hope to pull the engine and have a look inside the pan on Sunday. I expect the bearings to be okay, but the cam lobes to be trashed.

I'm not one for fads, but if value and efficiency generate popularity, so be it. I'm wondering if I can produce 550HP and 20 mpg for under $5K with all brand new hardware except for the core 5.3 take out. I will talk to Joe and the crew at Precision Turbo (http://www.precisionturbo.net) next week. Thanks /Steevo

conesare2seconds
conesare2seconds HalfDork
9/17/10 3:35 p.m.

406 rebuild, nothing wrong with old school, and the Sportsman heads are fine.

Scott Lear
Scott Lear
9/17/10 3:37 p.m.

VTEC, yo.

Sorry to hear about the ailing engine. As I type this, there are a bunch of great American Iron and AIX donor cars running past me on the massive front straight at Miller Motorsports Park. However, I think they're going to need their engines for their NASA Championship race.

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon MegaDork
9/17/10 7:31 p.m.

Rebuild it but then instead of a turbo hang FI on it. Make the most of those NA cubes!

You'll need to log in to post.

Sponsored by

Bilstein

G-Force

Canton Racing Products

Hella

ATI Racing

Our Preferred Partners
JLJ8LhjxMO7aA2cTma7Cjg4z91u4msphNvifDQdb9KJ6swpOVVcrYK7YKvIveILb