Sooo... this week the car broke down.
I was driving to work and stopped at a gas station.
When I went to leave, it wouldn't crank.
Subsequent checks confirmed good battery, bad alternator.
Would this repair qualify for a hardship exemption?
The alternator was fine when I bough the car, and it did not act up until now, after daily driving for about a month and 804 miles. I would like to claim an out of budget repair, in consideration of the time, miles driven, and how I fixed it.
Here's how....
To begin with, the original alternator for this car is a 90 Amp Bosch unit. It's about $250 for a good one and $140 for a cheap one. Add to that, that no one stocks this on the weekend and its a few days to order one.
I really never go to the junkyard for stuff like this, but since this is at present car #9 in the driveway and it cost $1000, spending $250 on one part was aggravating my delicate sensibilities.
Off to the junkyard, where all alternators are treated equal and cost about $26 bucks.
I bought 2 150 Amp bosch units. There were none like mine:
The two I found had bigger cases, but the two ears were in the same location, same thickness, and they had the same distance between the mounting centerline and the shaft centerline.
Good to go!
Right?
So here is where the smart kids ask about the pulley offset, or depth.
The only credit I can give myself is that even though I checked, post purchase, I did at least check before I mounted it.
OOPS !
Well now, that's not good.
I was about to give in and say 'nice try' and hit amazon.
But then I remembered a certain build thread where running Ferrari parts are just ingots of the approximate size and shape to drill, mill, weld, and bore into something even better. That guy is cutting up parts that are worth more than my whole car.
Certainly I can take a sawzall to a $26 junk yard part.
And I did. (note the piece of the ear that was cut away on the vice in the next pic)
Offset looks better now...