Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/12/17 12:23 p.m.

I'm trying to hold back here...angry

Desy
Desy New Reader
12/12/17 12:40 p.m.

In reply to Woody :

Not sure if insult of tempting ad. *insert Fry meme here*

Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/12/17 3:24 p.m.

That's not a Wagovan.

Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/12/17 3:28 p.m.

People like to say "Wagovan", but very few of these are actually Wagovans, and none of the RT-AWD ones were.

Wagovans were front wheel drive, with vinyl seats and a cargo bar to protect the rear side windows. Other than the funky name, they were the least desirable of the Civic wagons.

Just a little pet peeve of mine.

 

It was almost impossible to find a photo of one, but see the bar going across the rear side window? This is a Wagovan.

 

 

 

Desy
Desy New Reader
12/13/17 1:04 p.m.

Well wagon/shuttle/beagle/wagovan it's the same body style.

 

And although it's not the highest in demand car, it does have a bit of a following/after market for it. Its more desireable than the 01-05's that had the terrible D17 motor. Or even the 84-87 hatches which were just ugly. *with exception to the motul racing hatch*

Desy
Desy New Reader
12/14/17 1:32 p.m.

New price. Hate seeing it just sit not being driven as much as it should be. (I drive it about once a week)

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
E7mc7YyrQ5SmaA7VxnGz8z4K7jwlHnWgQxUzpWcolurFca0rAQYsaNAbp2IibsBG