In reply to frenchyd :
Let's take that same ICE at the beginning. Before Model T's when cars where just coming around. Say 1910? What was the percentage of cars to horses? I'll bet less than 7%.
Once the Model T came around and it started it's downward price spiral they got a whole lot cheaper.
So about 1920'ish? Cars started catching up to horses?
The same issues, where do we get gasoline? How far away from home can we go? Plus horses make other horses free. They can eat grass free
It all had to be figured out.
In Europe they were ahead of America. Right up to Henry FordsModel T.
Same with Europe today. You think it's only about air pollution? What about all that money that leaves Germany and France etc going to Saudi Arabia? Or Iran, or some place in Africa?
Heck, EV's power comes from wind, sun, and in some cases nuclear but it stays in country.
Yet Europe doesn't get 1/5th the Sun America gets, or 1/4 the wind the Midwest gets. In fact pretty much everything west of the Mississippi gets plenty of sun and decent or even the best wind in the world. Up in the mountains Solar really works well. There are mountain passes where wind is steady and strong.
If you actual read my posts I'm in favor of the new modual nuclear options. Because yes there will be times when it's night, and the wind isn't blowing.
Here in America we have states trying to keep money inside its borders. The millions/ billions that leave the state to buy gas/ oil / coal doesn't come back.
If pollution sells that story? OK it's about pollution.
With me? I don't worry that the utility company won't have enough money. I worry about me. Now I don't have oil on my property. Nor coal but the wind blows and the sun shines. That will do.
Let's pretend that everything above is true, and somehow relates to the topic.
So what?
I, and currently 93% of new car buyers really don't care that much about anything you mentioned above. When buying a car, it's a mix of cost/benefit analysis combined with how much I want the car and how much better that car will make my life. Everything you mentioned above is well down that list. You hint at cost savings, which is high on the list. But here you are, trying to convince us that you have the math problem right, but have yet to show the class your work. Show the math. With real numbers, produced by cars that exist. If you are correct, it should be easy and irrefutable. Show the math.
From another of your posts...
Tesla's system is reported faultless and extremely fast. Plug it into the charger and that $5-6 charge is automatic no card needed
Show us where you got this number. I know the correct answer and you are off by at least a factor of 3, best case scenario from the cheapest charger in the country. You are off by a factor of 5 or 6 from the average cost. It is impossible to have any discussion about cost when you just make up numbers.
The new Suburban gets 57mpg combined, 63mpg uphill. With no haggle pricing and a coupon, Chevy will sell you one for $25k. The average price of gas is $2 per gallon, so driving the average of 40 miles per day would only cost you $512.28 per year. If you replace a 2005 Civic with a new Suburban, it will pay for itself in only 58 years. Less if you live at the top of a hill.