sethmeister4 wrote: How about a Matrix? Looks cool, Toyota reliability, lots of cargo room, good MPG's, etc..
the 2.4 motor has a tiny bit more power than the 2.0 Mazda, but it gets way worse mileage. the 1.8 toyota has less power and still has worse fuel economy, on the interstate they're not even close (32 vs 39).
why else do i want one?
1966stang wrote: I'd second the CX-5
but the 3i was soo slow. wouldn't the cx-5 be even slower? it's 300 lbs heavier.
i just did the comparison chart between an elantra wagon and a 3i on Hyundai's corporate site.
the Mazda is 200 lbs lighter. has more power, more torque, and gets 5 mpg better in town and 9 mpg on the highway. 
You'll need to log in to post.
