http://www.motorcities.com/vehicle/09E6F040001995.html
http://www.motorcities.com/vehicle/09E6F040001995.html
That link doesnt explain much
If they build that, I will buy one.
What, no chicken on the hood?
Needs soar honeycomb. But still - way better fascias than the camaro.
I would not have done it with the shaker hood.. I liked the two scoops the formula had instead
DILYSI Dave wrote: Needs soar honeycomb. But still - way better fascias than the camaro.
Definitely much better looking than the camaro
ASC = Same company that did some of the 4th gen SS Camaros....
Prolly gonna want 40k for one, I can only dream...
really, you guys are into it? it looks like a kids toy bently nose on a poorly rendered mustang body, capped off with a tonka toy rear facia. wheres the barf smiley?
-J0N
DirtyBird222 wrote: ASC = Same company that did some of the 4th gen SS Camaros.... Prolly gonna want 40k for one, I can only dream...
Also the same company that gave us the Fox Body ASC McLaren Mustang that used the MBz soft top.
Opus wrote:DirtyBird222 wrote: ASC = Same company that did some of the 4th gen SS Camaros.... Prolly gonna want 40k for one, I can only dream...Also the same company that gave us the Fox Body ASC McLaren Mustang that used the MBz soft top.
My neighbor has one of those Mustangs....oops, I mean MacLaren - hope he doesn't see that...LOL. Neat car, but seems relatively pointless really.
DILYSI Dave wrote: Needs moar window glass so you can freaking see something.
Fixed.
DirtyBird222 wrote: ASC = Same company that did some of the 4th gen SS Camaros.... Prolly gonna want 40k for one, I can only dream...
It was SLP (Street Legal Performance) that did the SS.
That would look really good without those silly bezels around the headlights and radiator vents, and the silly fake rear brake cooling ducts (they could at least install some real ones). Looks like a ricer got his hands on an otherwise decent car.
You'll need to log in to post.
