http://bham.craigslist.org/sno/4286505813.html
I'm voting awesome. Only downside: Now it's harder to work on the engine (and you WILL need to get in there.)
I'd say it's awesome, but if he'd put the fuel tank where the back seats used to be and gave it a dumpable bed, it would have a lower CoG, probably more fuel capacity, more cargo capacity, and it would be easier to work on.
GameboyRMH wrote: I'd say it's awesome, but if he'd put the fuel tank where the back seats used to be and gave it a dumpable bed, it would have a lower CoG, probably more fuel capacity, more cargo capacity, and it would be easier to work on.
... or if he'd just left the fuel tank where it was ...
slantvaliant wrote:GameboyRMH wrote: I'd say it's awesome, but if he'd put the fuel tank where the back seats used to be and gave it a dumpable bed, it would have a lower CoG, probably more fuel capacity, more cargo capacity, and it would be easier to work on.... or if he'd just left the fuel tank where it was ...
True, but he'd have more frunk room with the tank in the rear seat location, it's just wasted space right now. Or he could've had dual tanks.
You'll need to log in to post.