ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
7/28/11 5:11 p.m.

I seem to remember someone making a comment on here (or maybe it was corner-carvers?) about the Steeda X2 balljoints being identical to a Crown Vic balljoint... anyone have more info on that? I'm all for Steeda, but if I can pay $30 for a replacement balljoint instead of $150, your damn right I'm gonna go that route.

Basically I've realized that at least some portion of my front grip issues are the fact that my A-arms angle up towards the tire with the car at rest, so any compression starts costing me negative camber. I figure the only ways to correct this are either with a taller balljoint (thus bringing the outer end of the A-arm down), relocating the mount point of the A-arm upward, and I don't have the time/money/skillz to do the latter.

So, a taller balljoint seems to be my best bet.

Of course, compounding the issue is the fact I'm running SN95 spindles on foxbody everything else. I think that the balljoints interchange insofar as how they mount in the A-arm, so that shouldn't be a huge issue, but...

Thanks!

jimbbski
jimbbski Reader
7/28/11 9:53 p.m.

You might get more information if you went to a forum called "Corner Carvers" and did a search. I am sure that this has been covered there. Do a search first as posting a question before searching for the answer will get you only grief there.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
7/28/11 10:40 p.m.
jimbbski wrote: You might get more information if you went to a forum called "Corner Carvers" and did a search. I am sure that this has been covered there. Do a search first as posting a question before searching for the answer will get you only grief there.

The forum I mentioned might be the one I heard it on? hahaha

novaderrik
novaderrik Dork
7/29/11 5:40 a.m.

look up the different ball joints on rockauto.com.. you can look at pics and there might even be some specs listed.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
7/29/11 8:09 a.m.

I found the post on CC that I had remembered.

What it said was the X2 was a Crown Vic balljoint in a Mustang housing (so that it would fit in the Mustang control arm).

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
7/29/11 10:51 a.m.

And after even further reading, I'm realizing that the taller balljoint alone isn't gonna do squat without a taller spring.

Damnit... everytime I think I can fix this on the cheap, I come back to "needing" to do a front CO coversion to make it work.

foxtrapper
foxtrapper SuperDork
7/29/11 10:55 a.m.

Are you trying to raise the car? Put a spacer in between the strut hat and the chassis tower.

novaderrik
novaderrik Dork
7/29/11 1:17 p.m.

a taller balljoint will lower the car by the amount that it is taller than the stocker, and may change the bumpsteer and camber curve a little bit.

ransom
ransom GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
7/29/11 1:51 p.m.

Apologies if I've fallen and hit my head without knowing it, but...

On a Mac strut front end, a taller ball joint shouldn't raise or lower the car at all, should it? It should just lower the outer end of the A-arm relative to the strut (plus whatever effect on camber/steer from changing the point in the A-arm's arc vs ride height). The distance from the hub to the spring perch stays the same, the overall ride height should be unchanged...

It's too simple. I feel like I must be having a no-coffee day (which I am)...

Why would a taller spring be necessary?

Double-apologies if this is something obvious that applies to the Mustang strut assembly that's not in my generic strut model in my head.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
7/29/11 2:01 p.m.

In reply to ransom:

You're right in general, but fox-chassis Mustangs use an inboard spring setup. Because of this, a taller balljoint actually lowers the car some, because it elevates the spindle away from the control arm, and the control arm height is dictated by the spring.

ransom
ransom GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
7/29/11 2:05 p.m.

In reply to ReverendDexter:

Thanks! Sorry, I should've at least googled for a look at the specific car before rambling on...

novaderrik
novaderrik Dork
7/29/11 4:21 p.m.

3rd gen Camaros are similar to Fox/SN95 Mustangs in that they don't have the spring mounted to the strut, but rather inboard like a car with upper control arms.

Javelin
Javelin GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
7/29/11 4:39 p.m.
ransom wrote: In reply to ReverendDexter: Thanks! Sorry, I should've at least googled for a look at the specific car before rambling on...

Hey don't beat yourself up! Some of us suspension-deficient readers are learning by reading these things, like me!

ncjay
ncjay Reader
7/29/11 7:43 p.m.

If you really want to get to know ball joints, look here: http://www.howeracing.com/c-560-howe-precision-ball-joints.aspx With a bit of research and a few tools, you can put almost any ball joint on any car if you can weld.

jimbbski
jimbbski Reader
7/29/11 10:57 p.m.

I did install the X2 joints on my car and it did lower the car a bit, about 1/4-38 of an inch. On most cars that won't make much of a difference unless the car already has lowering springs. I had already done a CO conversion so it was a non-issue. In fact the kit I bought included 2-1/4 inch spacers to place under the coil springs to conpensate for this.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
fx8q7Awv4kkIv4Xp4q4Y59cPBplcvOOIY3L1ZqrWjW77ejSW0DUWHZZA3EHUTjnU