AClockworkGarage said:
I'll provide context then, so it can be downvoted as well.
There exists within autocross a culture of "you didn't see nothing" Any time there is an incident people are strongly discouraged from taking photos video or talking about it because "we could lose the site" The illusion that autocross is a perfect;y safe hobby has to be maintained so that outsiders will let us race on their property. The problem with this illusion is that people start to believe it. Then complacency sets in.
The org in question is the NWR-SCCA. I was working course and a vehicle lost control and spun through my work station, narrowly avoiding hitting me. A racing incident, not a big deal really. I radioed in the four-off, reset the cones and got back to work. The org has a rule that if a car leaves the racing surface for any reason it's a dq and you are parked for the day. 10 minutes later the same car come racing by again. after the session had ended I went to find the people in charge to make sure that had heard that there was a four-off. The safety steward told me "they knew, but it was ok because they weren't driving dangerously and that I needed to stop worrying about it." I'd disagree, driver fault or not I did have to run to avoid being struck by a car which then left the racing surface. They're your rules, if you're not going to enforce them then why have them? The steward's nonchalant attitude towards a very legitimate grievance was enough for me to withdraw from the rest of the season's events. If they didn't start taking safety seriously somebody is going to get killed.
I was not at this event but two of my best friends were at this event. One of them was in the latrines less than a minute earlier.
Maybe this was a medical condition, I don't know. none of us do. but writing it off as a "medical, trsgic but what could be done?" is the same complacency that got us here in the first place. I feel for the victims, their families and my former fellow competitors. You're feelings are valid. but let's not fall into the same old situation where we pretend what we do isn't a game with life and death stakes.
You can't prevent all incidents, but some forethought can mitigate them. Look at the course design and ask yourself are their safe run-off points? are there areas around the competitive surface that should be off limits when the course is hot? should we really be placing the latrines immediacy behind the stop box? This was an extremely expensive wake up call.
At the last event I attended in Bremmerton a car left the racing surface, skidded across a hundred feet of wet grass and crashed ass-first through a fence onto an active airfield. We were told not to take pictures because we might lose the site. If anyone ever races at Packwood again, I'll eat my hat.
You may think I'm insensitive but i'm the only one saying the things that really need to be said. I'm not ignoring the fact that two real actual people are gone. I'm hyper aware of it.
I see no reason to downvote this and I agree with you that regardless of whether or not this was a safety-related incident, we should look at safety in general and this site in particular for lessons learned.
I have definitely felt the "you didn't see anything and don't post photos" at multiple sites and clubs. I witnessed a wheel come off of an orange SRT-4 at Packwood, a supercharged fox Mustang climb the pit wall at PIR South, a Formula SAE catch fire (that I put out) at PIR North, a stuck throttle on a 240SX that resulted in a mounted boulder twenty yards off course at PIR North, and of course the infamous GT3 spin into the parked cars paddock at PIR North. All but the last were kept offline and we were very much encouraged by those in charge to keep it that way.
I did not know about the 4-wheel-off rule at NWR SCCA, and if it was in place the last time I raced with them (4 seasons ago) then I do not remember it. At first reaction, I want to shout "that's a dumb rule, cars go 4 off at autocross all the time without an issue" but really thinking about, and in particular the Packwood event 3 weeks ago, I think it's got potential to be a good rule. We had the same car/driver spin and go 4 off at least 3 runs that weekend and a number of close calls with corner workers and cars leaving course.
As for this particular course, the finish (which had a slalom element) was well back from the buildings and both the exits for each lane and the entrance for cars coming from grid (which is in the building on the left) were in between the finish and the latrines and building. There was at least 150 feet from the end of the finish area to the impact area.