ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter UltraDork
8/28/12 11:48 a.m.

By next season I should have my suspension sorted on the foxbody, at which point I'm planning to go from my current 17x8s with 245/45 Star Specs to my 17x9s. However, Dunlop doesn't make the Star Specs any wider than 265s (at least in a 17), so I'm kinda lost as to what's going to be the fast tire for a 3300+ lb pig of a car. Would I be better off sticking with star specs and only getting another 20mm, or going to something like the R1R in a 275, or even wider and something else?

For what it's worth, I'm under no class restrictions in terms of size, just the typical 130(140?) treadwear cutoff.

yamaha
yamaha HalfDork
8/28/12 11:59 a.m.

well, considering I have 245/45 specs on my 17x8's currently, do the toyo's run just as wide?

I only mention this, because the 245/45 star specs were 3/4" wider than the 245/45 v700 victoracers they replaced.

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac MegaDork
8/28/12 12:08 p.m.

I would bet the R1Rs would be faster in a 275 than the Specs in a 265.

That said, i'd rather run Specs on the street, mostly due to longevity.

My vote is either the Specs or the Kumho XS in 275/40-17.

Gearheadotaku
Gearheadotaku GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
8/28/12 12:12 p.m.

Falken RT-615K?

e_pie
e_pie HalfDork
8/28/12 12:39 p.m.

Kumho XS probably.

Bobzilla
Bobzilla SuperDork
8/28/12 12:56 p.m.

XS is likely what I'll run, but in the staggered 275/315 setup on the vette next year.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter UltraDork
8/28/12 2:46 p.m.

Guy in my club went from 275 XSs to 265 Star Specs and swears up and down the Star Specs are noticably grippier.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
6EVIxY4Q4rFuag6bAU7cTU8wk9PFBxlvG9kL2tzcpzw0L42q50O22ApAkFN9F4rY