poopshovel wrote:
Gawd that makes me want to berkeley.
Carson wrote: Since we're .GIFing
Yet another drunken idea I should've patented as soon as I came up with it. Damnit.
Nothing like going two wide, in the rain, through Eau Rouge, in 917's...
Or, just going two wide at Watkins Glen for that matter...
David Adams wrote:TJ wrote: Didn't want to miss out on the Volvo trend.This makes me want to go buy a Volvo wagon. It also stimulates parts of me that I wasn't aware I had . . . .like this thing . . . ......what IS that?
That would be an 850 raced in the BTCC by Tom Walkinshaw Racing.
http://www.aaanimalcontrol.com/opossumcar.htm
http://jalopnik.com/5182381/adventures-with-wildlife-surprise-underhood-opossum-nest
SkinnyG wrote:
Awesome.....After I get my '32 datsun-locost-thingy running, I plan to re-read what you wrote about using independent motorcycle throttle bodies on your car. If it's something that I think I can pull off on a budget I may try to do the same.
JoeyM wrote: http://www.aaanimalcontrol.com/opossumcar.htm http://jalopnik.com/5182381/adventures-with-wildlife-surprise-underhood-opossum-nest
shadetree30 wrote: < It's a Viggen, the two in front of it are Drakens, and I'm guessing the front one is a Sabre (thus not really a SAAB...unless they built them under liscence or something?) Then again, it might be a Tunnan ("Flying Barrel") but you only see the top view...
Most defiantly a J29 Tunnan. Look at the empennage:
Appleseed wrote: Most defiantly a J29 Tunnan. Look at the empennage:
Well, when you put it THAT way...(and I had to ask myself, "why would Sweden build Sabres under liscence when they were perfectly capable of designing their own kick-ass aircraft...?")
Hey, didja know Sweden once had a nuclear weapons program and SAAB was planning a nuclear bomber?
(SAAB 36)
You'll need to log in to post.