racerfink wrote:
ROFL!!
Now I have to clean the keyboard again...nuts!
JoeyM
Dork
8/1/10 10:31 p.m.
Jensenman wrote:
My Gawd. How the hell could that be considered beauty? Someone tell me those are photoshops.
It is possible that a few models could actually be that thin. Some of them are now being photoshopped to look heavier
Holland & Barrett has been plunged into a row over size-zero models after airbrushing a shockingly thin girl to make her appear curvier and healthier.
The health food giant altered the body of Polish model Kamilla Wladyka in an attempt to conceal how thin she was when she appeared on the April cover of its customer magazine - called Healthy.
Jane Druker, editor of the magazine that promotes 'health and wellbeing', told a debate on digital modifying or 'retouching': 'We had to put on about half a stone.'
Miss Druker claimed Miss Wladyka had appeared healthy during casting, but looked too thin to feature on the magazine's cover on the day of the photo shoot a week later.
The details on Miss Wladyka's modelling card, provided by her agency, claim that she is a size 6, with a 24 inch waist
'There were plenty of clothes that we couldn't put on her because her bones stuck out too much,' Miss Druker said.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1278795/Skinny-health-magazine-cover-model-Kamilla-Wladyka-airbrushed-make-look-fatter.html#ixzz0vPpuobsQ
JoeyM wrote:
Platinum90 wrote:
In honor of tonights episode of Mad Men, I do not know what you would call her, but this is how I like my women!
Her name is christina hendricks.
SWMBO with her son. The low light screws up the pic, she's really naturally a "dark" redhead. Of course, she's also a "counter-culture" girl, and dyes is any color from black to brighter red to green depending on her mood. This is one of the few pix I have of her natural color. Damn shame the camera lens is such a poor substitute for the human eye..
JoeyM
Dork
8/2/10 6:08 a.m.
Jensenman wrote:
My Gawd. How the hell could that be considered beauty? Someone tell me those are photoshops.
Found it....those are photoshopped. Snopes has a comparison of the photoshopped pictures with the originals here:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/models.asp
FWIW, though, Ralph Lauren got bad press for doing almost the same thing - taking an already-thin model and photoshopping her into a skeletally thin one - to use in a fashion magazine.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/emboing-boingem-and-ralph_n_311593.html
cars...remember cars? I likes em a little on the heavy side too...just a little
Cosworth 190e
JoeyM
Dork
8/2/10 6:21 a.m.
nderwater wrote:
JoeyM wrote:
....but I prefer curvy.
Details?
Don't have any. I just googled 'curvy', and they were in the image search. 'cury kate' was the name of the company.
racinginc215 wrote:
I'll take the curvy girls you guys can go pump away on a bag of antlers that's shaped like a 12 year old boy. Here for the skinny chick lovers.
Real thing looks pretty good
zomby woof wrote:
Platinum90 wrote:
I do not know what you would call her
The next Mrs. Miller
And now for your hot lined enjoyment:
The periodic table of metal
One thing we can all agree on
DukeOfUndersteer wrote:
and...
I like this. Makes me want a Smart.
But what are the metal pieces showcased in front of the car?
Duke
SuperDork
8/2/10 8:47 a.m.
Kia_racer wrote:
DukeOfUndersteer wrote:
and...
I like this. Makes me want a Smart.
Too bad it's a bad Photoshop.
carguy123 wrote:
But what are the metal pieces showcased in front of the car?
Standard-issue "stance krew" glamour shot industrial landscape clutter. I'm actually surprised that thing doesn't have a fake rusty hood.
These girls are fine, but the other one you've been posting is way more than just a plus size, she's fat!
JoeyM wrote:
I'd happily spend quality time with any of these women....but I prefer curvy.