I always thought something like this would be a cool Challenger.
Fat, Slow, Fugly, but cool as hell.
I always thought something like this would be a cool Challenger.
Fat, Slow, Fugly, but cool as hell.
914Driver wrote:
Roger Dean, izzat chu?
914Driver wrote: I always thought something like this would be a cool Challenger. Fat, Slow, Fugly, but cool as hell.
I dig it! It reminds me of my granddad's motorboat!
Duke wrote: I absolutely want a Hillman Imp some day. Probably more than I want a classic Mini.
I've owned so many Imps I"ve lost count, easily into double digits before I moved here 20 odd years ago. I now have a strange issue where my mind wont let me read about them in the magazine. Over the years both GRM and CM have done Imp articles and I've never read them, my brain just wont let me.
My mind has been occupied with these ever since I watched the Goodwood Hill climb last month.
914Driver wrote:
Interesting looking but how is that better than this?
singleslammer wrote:914Driver wrote:Interesting looking but how is that better than this?
It looks better in its natural environment here
In reply to singleslammer:
Because its cooler.
In reply to Adrian_Thompson:
If you want to show a classic bike, at least pick one that was made before 2009 
mattmacklind wrote: In reply to singleslammer: Because its cooler.
I bet that the first one is physically hotter (I know) but I like my chin too much to wear either of those. I guess I am not in style.
singleslammer wrote:914Driver wrote:Interesting looking but how is that better than this?
Because Bird of Prey look
singleslammer wrote: In reply to Adrian_Thompson: If you want to show a classic bike, at least pick one that was made before 2009
I read it as the point... (Poser cough cough)
You'll need to log in to post.
