Appleseed wrote: No, but here's the dyno graph. Average Peak Horsepower Over Three Pulls: 981.67 Average Peak Torque Over Three Pulls: 863.33 Remember, this thing is 599ci and naturally aspirated.
just out of curiosity what was the fuel burn....
Appleseed wrote: No, but here's the dyno graph. Average Peak Horsepower Over Three Pulls: 981.67 Average Peak Torque Over Three Pulls: 863.33 Remember, this thing is 599ci and naturally aspirated.
just out of curiosity what was the fuel burn....
Flight Service wrote:Appleseed wrote: No, but here's the dyno graph. Average Peak Horsepower Over Three Pulls: 981.67 Average Peak Torque Over Three Pulls: 863.33 Remember, this thing is 599ci and naturally aspirated.just out of curiosity what was the fuel burn....
Just stick that fuel nozzle in the intake. That might cover it.
Rob_Mopar wrote:Wally wrote:Was that a Sebring convertible?
I assumed so. Which led to the corollary question: How in the name of Bob do you get a Sebring going fast enough or hard enough to wind up in that kind of trouble?!
In reply to GameboyRMH:
Cheap, standard valve cover breathers. Those are often fitted directly into the valve covers without a balance tube arrangement.
The balance tube arrangement is...interesting.
GameboyRMH wrote: Anyone know what those two cylinders in front of the air filter are?
Crankcase breathers. Pipeline gives the oil somewhere to slosh up and return during hard cornering while still allowing the crankcase to breathe.
I'm pretty sure that's the Sam Posey '70 Trans Am Dodge Challenger. Engine compartment looks like it's a current shot, not historic.
Duke wrote:Rob_Mopar wrote:I assumed so. Which led to the corollary question: **How in the name of Bob do you get a Sebring going fast enough or hard enough to wind up in that kind of trouble?!**Wally wrote:Was that a Sebring convertible?
It's art, Spock wouldn't understand. ..
NOHOME wrote: I give up...What am I supposed to see in this picture?
In context with the dyno chart a person in amazment that the number to feed the car was huge...
Or just a really censored version from the GGA thread. Your choice.
Flight Service wrote:NOHOME wrote: I give up...What am I supposed to see in this picture?In context with the dyno chart a person in amazment that the number to feed the car was huge... Or just a really censored version from the GGA thread. Your choice.
True story. My uncle had a 35' boat with twin 454s. Always had a problem with coming up onto a plane. He thought it was over propped, because the engines didn't like turning more than 3500 rpms. Called in a pro, who told him to change the 1/2" fuel line to 3/4".
Problem solved.
Rob_Mopar wrote:
I remember a show once upon a time where Sam Posey and Mark Donahue were reminiscing. Dohahue talked about the gas filler that held an extra gallon of fuel, outside the 22 gallon tank size limit. "Where did you hide yours?"
After some laughs and gentle ribbing Posey finally admits "Under the dashboard ......"
Safety First!
You'll need to log in to post.