Indy-Guy wrote:
Very artsy, but no.
Indy-Guy wrote:
Takes the 'cab forward' movement too far.
In Reply to Toyman01:
Toyman01 wrote:Indy-Guy wrote:Very artsy, but no.
Too artsy, yes agreed. But you missed the point.
Look again: Cab over engine OVER THE BACK WHEELS, engine up front, like old dragster rail:
This is what Mazduece should do with his COE project.
Signed off on the new springs today. Not just because of how they look, but how they dance. Although they do look pretty good...
Indy-Guy wrote: In Reply to Toyman01:Toyman01 wrote:Too artsy, yes agreed. But you missed the point. Look again: Cab over engine OVER THE BACK WHEELS, engine up front, like old dragster rail:Indy-Guy wrote:Very artsy, but no.
I get it, I even see it.
This is infinitely better.
Indy-Guy wrote:
Can we take 2 feet out behind the engine and 2 feet in front as well? Then maybe we'd have something?...
Indy-Guy wrote:
Somebody tell me how to change a rear tire on this when it goes flat!
Duke wrote:
Wow! Porsche "quality"
Edit: This image is from Porsche's marketing 
EvanR wrote:Indy-Guy wrote:Somebody tell me how to change a rear tire on this when it goes flat!
Looks like the skirt is bolted on with five shiny bolts.
Fender skirts have some good aero advantages. I wonder why we haven't seen a resurgence? These two cars don't have a whole lot else in common...
In reply to Keith Tanner:
Because you cannot be hellaflush with side skirts?
I was thinking more of the manufacturers, for whom there is a real benefit to improved aero. You never know what those crazy kids will do next.
Although some of the hypermile guys are pretty creative.
In reply to fanfoy:
fanfoy wrote:Duke wrote:Wow! Porsche "quality"
Mazda is the lowest quality? Umm... methinks they're threatened by someone whose cars are raced more than their own.
Rotfl at toyota, vw and porsche being "tied" in quality.
You'll need to log in to post.
