FlightService wrote:
Maroon92 wrote:
FlightService wrote:
N Sperlo wrote:
Maybe its just that this movie is silly all around.
I nothing silly about Michelle Rodriguez. I can watch her on mute all day.
really? That vapid look and giant lips is all she has to her acting credit. You wouldn't need an airbag in an accident with lips like that.
You have a problem with giant lips? Really?
Yeah. She kinda looks like a Mongoloid.
paul
Reader
7/3/11 6:04 p.m.
...she looks like the singer from SUM 41:
JoeyM
SuperDork
7/3/11 6:22 p.m.
paul wrote:
I disagree....he has a really wide nose. He looks more like the MCP than like Ms. Rodriguez
FlightService wrote:
Just because this thread.
"Why don't you just have a seat over there..."
JoeyM wrote:
I disagree....he has a really wide nose. He looks more like the MCP than like Ms. Rodriguez
I desire... POPCORN NECKLACES!
NGTD
HalfDork
7/3/11 9:47 p.m.
slefain wrote:
FlightService wrote:
Just because this thread.
"Why don't you just have a seat over there..."
No longer the case - born in 1989.
Interesting story:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1857190.ece
JoeyM
SuperDork
7/3/11 10:09 p.m.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/theuniblogger/princess-leia-in-a-vader-suit-bhd
NGTD wrote:
No longer the case - born in 1989.
Interesting story:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1857190.ece
So she has been legal since '97, and therefore the entire time span of this thread!!!
(I feel strange I had to justified that.)
but anyway
slefain wrote:
FlightService wrote:
Just because this thread.
"Why don't you just have a seat over there..."
She can have a seat right over here.
FlightService wrote:
NGTD wrote:
No longer the case - born in 1989.
Interesting story:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1857190.ece
So she has been legal since '97, and therefore the entire time span of this thread!!!
(I feel strange I had to justified that.)
two options here:
- your math is teh suck
- you live in a place with berkeleyed up laws concerning sex with children
i almost forgot the obligatory hotlinked photo:
AngryCorvair wrote:
FlightService wrote:
NGTD wrote:
No longer the case - born in 1989.
Interesting story:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1857190.ece
So she has been legal since '97, and therefore the entire time span of this thread!!!
(I feel strange I had to justified that.)
two options here:
1. your math is teh suck
2. you live in a place with berkeleyed up laws concerning sex with children
She was 18 in 07? shes 21-22
Legal
In fact in Missouri, she was "legal" in 06.
In reply to AngryCorvair:
Hung over math
2007
still longer than the life of this thread
Yes, TN has strange laws but not that strange
"one should not have access to the internet while drinking"
Just to help with the haters here
We could go over some very interesting sex laws if you like. Thats the whole reason i studied CJ.
Just because I don't want it to go away. I'm 3 years older than her. Its not gross.. for me
Apparently a "liberator whirl" is something a bit naughty.
JoeyM
SuperDork
7/4/11 1:00 p.m.
hadn't seen that pillow. they also make the liberator shapes
Speaking of shapes, I found this and I may offer 200.00 for it.
Duke
SuperDork
7/4/11 1:14 p.m.
747:
I was looking for a pic of the prototype test flight where they dragged its ass halfway down the runway on full up elevator before lifting, but can't seem to find it.