oldsaw wrote:z31maniac wrote: Again I support a rant by our resident scatological expert.Which one? We have plenty of worthy candidates.
None of whom heart teh poo more than I.
oldsaw wrote:z31maniac wrote: Again I support a rant by our resident scatological expert.Which one? We have plenty of worthy candidates.
None of whom heart teh poo more than I.
oldsaw wrote:z31maniac wrote: Again I support a rant by our resident scatological expert.Which one? We have plenty of worthy candidates.
The one who is likely listening to "South of Heaven" whilst typing out his diatribes!
Thank you for proving my point. Your reference to "the one" show that you are completely biased and unwilling to believe that the man that was elected by the American people has actual positive intentions. It's not that you don't agree with his policies, but it's an evil conspiracy to take over the world and "but berkeley" the American people. He wants health care just so he can personally control another aspect of your life and form death panels to kill your grandma. He bailed out the financial system just so he could pay off his buddies, not to try to save the economy. He wants the rich to pay more taxes, not because they can actually afford it, but because that extra 3% is all it is going to take to equalize the wealth of the American people and form the Socialist state that his secret Muslim buddies and himself have been trying to create all while not actually being a citizen of the US. You do sound like an ignorant hick.
SVRex I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But I don't see how that title is anything other then floundering. Just bait to stir up E36 M3. How is a reference to Happy Days going downhill have anything to do with a former President speaking publicly?
Umm... I didn't say that. That was Hess, and he is not the OP.
I've NEVER said it. Check my posts. I try to be VERY careful to refer to him only as President Obama (a respect I give to all presidents).
Surely you've been around long enough to know what to expect from Hess, right?
SVreX wrote: Umm... I didn't say that. That was Hess, and he is not the OP. I've NEVER said it. Check my posts. I try to be VERY careful to refer to him only as President Obama (a respect I give to all presidents). Surely you've been around long enough to know what to expect from Hess, right?
I am aware that was Hess. I am sure he is currently polishing his gun while masturbating to Palin's photo on his tea bag alter. My only comment towards you was at the bottom about the title.
"Jump the Shark"- a reference to a moment in time when a long standing icon of American culture took a turn from which it would never recover, and which everyone recognized as such at the moment it happened.
I will try to avoid using media metaphors and references if it upsets you so.
I would appreciate it if you would do your best to avoid grossly incorrect stereotypes and ignorantly biased statements.
Cone_Junky wrote: I am aware that was Hess. I am sure he is currently polishing his gun while masturbating to Palin's photo on his tea bag alter. My only comment towards you was at the bottom about the title.
I believe that was an edit on your part, which you wrote after I had read the original post and during the time I was writing my response.
Right?
You know, I'd have to see a different view to make a conclusion on that. You really can't tell if he has already done it or is about to. If he has already done it, then I say "good landing", if not, I'd suggest losing the death stick or he might get ashes in his eyes.
Fascism- Fascists believe that a nation is an organic community that requires strong leadership, singular collective identity, and the will and ability to commit violence and wage war in order to keep the nation strong.[14] They claim that culture is created by the collective national society and its state, that cultural ideas are what give individuals identity, and thus they reject individualism.[14] Viewing the nation as an integrated collective community, they see pluralism as a dysfunctional aspect of society, and justify a totalitarian state as a means to represent the nation in its entirety.[15][16]
They advocate the creation of a single-party state.[17] Fascist governments forbid and suppress opposition to the fascist state and the fascist movement.[18] They identify violence and war as actions that create national regeneration, spirit and vitality.[19]
Sounds like the Republican/Tea Bag platform to me. Violent protests, starting of wars to show superiority (or to get re-elected), the Patriot act to further executive power, vilifying those who disagree ("hating the troops" if you didn't support Bush)...
SVreX wrote:Cone_Junky wrote: I am aware that was Hess. I am sure he is currently polishing his gun while masturbating to Palin's photo on his tea bag alter. My only comment towards you was at the bottom about the title.I believe that was an edit on your part, which you wrote after I had read the original post and during the time I was writing my response. Right?
Except I actually quoted Hess in my rant, so no, you're not right. I just added the last part instead of creating another post to respond to your remarks.
Cone_Junky wrote: Thank you for proving my point. Your reference to "the one" show that you are completely biased and unwilling to believe that the man that was elected by the American people has actual positive intentions. It's not that you don't agree with his policies, but it's an evil conspiracy to take over the world and "but berkeley" the American people. He wants health care just so he can personally control another aspect of your life and form death panels to kill your grandma. He bailed out the financial system just so he could pay off his buddies, not to try to save the economy. He wants the rich to pay more taxes, not because they can actually afford it, but because that extra 3% is all it is going to take to equalize the wealth of the American people and form the Socialist state that his secret Muslim buddies and himself have been trying to create all while not actually being a citizen of the US. You do sound like an ignorant hick. SVRex I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But I don't see how that title is anything other then floundering. Just bait to stir up E36 M3. How is a reference to Happy Days going downhill have anything to do with a former President speaking publicly?
well thnk about it, if Bush had done those things, you'd be E36 M3ting all over it, but you're not because you voted for the guy that won, you're the winner, and everyone else are a bunch of moronic inbred hicks that can't get past the fact that the guy is 1/2 black in order to see how great he is. or at least how great he wants to be, if those damn racist rebublicans would let him. yes, because the filibuster proof, veto proof house and senate just couldn't get past those damn racists, who have no actual power to do anything but debate until january 2011.
obama made fun of mccain when he talked about taxing employee healthcare payments like he was some kind of imbecile, yet when he pushes that through in obamacare, its the greatest berkleying thing since the birth of christ.
tell me this: what ever happened to that tally that CNN was running to keep track of all of Obamas campaign promises and whether or not he kept them? was it me, or did that just quietly disappear?
bravenrace wrote: In reply to fast_eddie_72: Sorry, but no human can prove that creationism is wrong without a doubt until they die. You believe it is wrong, but you don't know.
Yup. I do.
I know if I jump off a building I will fall. I know that some time around 5:00 this evening the sun will set. I know the Moon orbits the Earth. And I know without a doubt that creationism is wrong. Sorry. Humans can prove creationism is wrong. Humans have proven that creationism is wrong. We don't belive- we know.
Cone_Junky wrote:SVreX wrote:Except I actually quoted Hess in my rant, so no, you're not right. I just added the last part instead of creating another post to respond to your remarks.Cone_Junky wrote: I am aware that was Hess. I am sure he is currently polishing his gun while masturbating to Palin's photo on his tea bag alter. My only comment towards you was at the bottom about the title.I believe that was an edit on your part, which you wrote after I had read the original post and during the time I was writing my response. Right?
Understood. It is clear that there isn't any possibility that I could be right.
SVreX wrote: Name-calling and personal attacks are such exceptionally effective forms of communication!
There is an unmistakable level of vitriol that seems to permeate some.
fast_eddie_72 wrote:bravenrace wrote: In reply to fast_eddie_72: Sorry, but no human can prove that creationism is wrong without a doubt until they die. You believe it is wrong, but you don't know.Yup. I do. I know if I jump off a building I will fall. I know that some time around 5:00 this evening the sun will set. I know the Moon orbits the Earth. And I know without a doubt that creationism is wrong. Sorry. Humans can prove creationism is wrong. Humans have proven that creationism is wrong. We don't belive- we know.
"We don't belive - we know."?
Really? That kind of unequivocal claim is why people "somewhere-in-the-middle" created the phrase "lunatic fringe".
A closed mind is like a clogged toilet - when the E36 M3 backs-up, the mess keeps getting worse.....
Just sayin!
You'll need to log in to post.