Jensenman wrote:
HenryC: I used to feed mice to the wife's ball python. They have to be alive when that is done or the snake won't see them. Now THAT could be considered cruelty; chunking one live animal in a cage for another to eat. But no, it's just nature's way. That's what happens in the wild.
Live feeding is irresponsible - snakes can eat pre-killed just fine. There are a couple of risks accosiated with it, and it is just as 'natural' as keeping a snake in an enclosure. But that's a matter for another topic.
Jensenman wrote: Nature and circumstance is far crueler than anything I could dream up.
Nature is amoral and circumstances of it cannot be controlled - are you using what happens in nature as an excuse for your own actions? Please. By that logic I could justify kicking a dog just because they get treated worse in China.
Actually, I don't think nature can be far crueller? Why? The intent to be malicious - humans are such a creative species. Hell, we've even made ways to torture ourselves effectively. Most of the things in nature are merciful compared to what we are capable of. For one thing, a human can decide to prolong something's pain where it would most likely never be encountered in nature in the first place. A predator isn't going to do something like that.
Jensenman wrote: I told her I could kill them immediately via the Toyman method and outlined a couple of other possibilities, she got a little green and voted for putting them in the trash.
So you left them to starve to death? Well done. "Green", what the hell?
Jensenman wrote: By the way: snap traps are also not 100% instant kill. In my younger days, I remember more than once being sent to check a trap and there was a still alive wriggling mouse in it. The design has not changed since then.
No trap is infallible, but the chances of getting a swift kill are a lot better than a 100% chance of suffering of leaving an animal starving to death in your garbage bin.
Jensenman wrote: In short, when it comes to dealing with mice: the only truly 'humane' thing to do is let them run rampant, any other type of treatment of any trapping or killing is cruel.
Being humane doesn't have to mean "let live". It can also mean "put out of misery"... killing it on a glue trap is an act of kindness, rather than leaving it to starve. Honestly, you've never heard of a humane kill before? Oh, it's like - killing in a way that is as painless as possible, rather than leaving the animal to rip its skin off, gnaw at its legs and dehydrate/starve to death.
Jensenman wrote:I do not hunt because I think target shooting with live targets is unnecessarily cruel. But that will not stop me from dispatching something that could present a threat to me or mine. (If you think mice could not be a life or death problem, Google 'hantavirus' or 'Four Corners Disease'.)
Yet you throw a living mammal stuck on superglue in your rubbish while it is still alive? That's as unnecessarily cruel as you can get. I'm not questioning the purpose of dispatching something if it's a problem, I'm questioning your method.
I never said mice aren't a problem, or a health hazard - but those things have absolutely nothing to do with quickly killing an animal on a trap vs giving it an extremely slow and painful death. You're also exaggerating - hantavirus is incredibly rare, something like under 100 cases in the US a year. They're not as dangerous as you'd like to believe. Otherwise I would be dead by now (I lived on a farm when I was little, we had mouse plagues in Australia).
Jensenman wrote: The method I chose that last time sure beats some others I've seen and heard of.
My point still stands. Your method was disgraceful and just simply prolonged the creature's agony, when you could have just put it out of its misery. No instances of "brutal nature" is going to make that any more or less horrid... especially since you had a choice of how to dispose of it. T'was an act of human cruelty, nothing more.
That it is a pest is irrelevant, because you caught the animal anyway. Once you catch it, it stops becoming a problem so this really isn't about pest control. The animal is helpless on the trap, probably injured and frightened out of its wits - and what do you do? Yeah, just throw it in a garbage like a piece of rubbish - where it took who knows how long for it to finally die. Leaving it on the glue trap itself is bad enough (they get horribly injured on them), but to intentionally starve it on one, to prolong its pain? Wow, I don't know what to say.