In reply to nocones: I see what you did there, with your sarcasm and pointing out factual information.
In reply to nocones: I see what you did there, with your sarcasm and pointing out factual information.
In reply to logdog:
Only when it's got a big engine stuffed in it and is entered in the $2035 challenge.
Last dealer I worked at tried to take up the mitsubishi nameplate after Hummer folded. biggest and last mistake they made. Mitsubishi right up to the evo sucks big furry goat balls.
In reply to nocones:
Hell, there's some poor sap out there who'll still be making payments on one when it's value has dropped below Challenge-level.
And now I'm going to go spec one out…. Thanks you goddamn bunch of enablers!!!
Mmadness wrote: I got the "Best Sub-compact car" award by the Hispanic Motoring press, seriously!
Theres a such thing as the "Hispanic Motoring press"?
logdog wrote: Isnt the Mirage the exact kinda car we all get excited over when its 20 years old?
If it were a 2dr.
logdog wrote: Isnt the Mirage the exact kinda car we all get excited over when its 20 years old?
Exactly.
"Remember back in 2014 when no one bought the Mirage, now in 2034 they are great track/course material".
Tom Suddard wrote: Heh. They just mailed me something saying the Mirage was the best thing since sliced bread. I see a good stunt car in the making.
and just as stale! (Rimshot! "Thank you, I be here all the week!")
I had actually forgotten that Mitsubishi still imported cars to the US.
The specs and reviews on the new Mirage make it sound like it's basically a 1996-1999 Hyundai Accent, but with an even weaker motor. I have a really hard time understanding why someone would buy it over the other subcompacts out there, especially with as good as the Fiesta and Spark are.
You'll need to log in to post.