i would have lost. i took the over on 1:22, and when i checked at 1:19, well, you know.
i would have lost. i took the over on 1:22, and when i checked at 1:19, well, you know.
I miss the good old days when we had to lock Amy threads. Can we get back to original content like that?
In reply to Tom Suddard :
I haven't been able to post as much as I previously had. I honestly thought that would lead to improved overall content.
I'm sure there are folks on here that understand.
My "want to know" nature wants to ask.
I'm probably better off not having a clue!
In reply to 03Panther :
I am guessing it's the latest locked thread.
In reply to Brett_Murphy (Agent of Chaos) :
Not yet...
It's working on it though.
In reply to Toyman! :
Naw.
That's the "Next to be locked" thread.
I miss ECM...
Off to quickly look for the thread
Tom Suddard said:I miss the good old days when we had to lock Amy threads. Can we get back to original content like that?
I do miss those days. Maybe that's part of my absence. Everyone needs to chill and have a snapple or something.
Oh THAT one.
No clue what the code word Amy means. Before my time.
Despite the joke thread being offensive and derogatory, I did find it funny, and not directed at me, so not offensive. Maybe it was inappropriate and should have been locked right away? Or maybe it's only offensive to people Tom doesn't like?
Seemed to maintain a polite discussion to me; maybe tony and air cooled saw some posts I didn't?
Oh, well.
Might want to lock this down, as well?
03Panther said:No clue what the code word Amy means. Before my time.
Despite the joke thread being offensive and derogatory, I did find it funny, and not directed at me, so not offensive. Maybe it was inappropriate and should have been locked right away? Or maybe it's only offensive to people Tom doesn't like?Seemed to maintain a polite discussion to me; maybe tony and air cooled saw some posts I didn't?
Oh, well.
I think it's less about that particular thread and more about the poor horse that's been beaten to death so hard it's come back to life and died again. I only glanced at it and someone said what I believe is the only thing that needs to be said- those that are going to have done so by now and the ones that haven't aren't going to, so why continue to argue veracity?
As for the amy thing- that's a bygone era. And at the request of op on that thread, that's all I'm going to say about it.
This thread is about one I locked early this morning. I think all the vague posts about posts might be confusing people.
In reply to Tom Suddard :
Any chance we can bring out the yellow flag again?
OK, if no one else will say it, I will....
yes, I'm going there...
SUV's SUCK!
Go back and look at, say, the last 20 locked threads. Make note of the names you see. You'll start to see a pattern.
In reply to Mndsm :
I did not see any arguments. Tony and aircolled apparently read stuff I didn't, and were being negitive.
But since the, aww, screw it.
Tom Suddard said:This thread is about one I locked early this morning. I think all the vague posts about posts might be confusing people.
Being thic headed, with all the subtle ness of a lead brick, I get confused easy
In reply to Tom Suddard :
That one didn't even have a chance to go sideways.
Did you get a speed holster for the lock button?
aircooled said:OK, if no one else will say it, I will....
yes, I'm going there...
SUV's SUCK!
I think they're great and when will people stop confusing liftbacks with hatchbacks?
Wow, I miss a lot being out on sales calls.
Angry - my bet is you'll make it in 2023.
In reply to Datsun310Guy :
No. No you didn't. It was s semi-fun thread fixing to turn into a E36 M3 sandwich.
Scotty Con Queso said:Angry - my bet is you'll make it in 2023.
Dude, *nobody's* gonna take the under on that one!
This topic is locked. No further posts are being accepted.
