1 ... 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 ... 1788
Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 2:23 p.m.

Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 2:23 p.m.

Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 2:24 p.m.

Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 2:24 p.m.

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 3:16 p.m.

914Driver
914Driver MegaDork
2/3/23 4:05 p.m.

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 4:25 p.m.

Appleseed
Appleseed MegaDork
2/3/23 4:49 p.m.
Duke said:

Altima in poor condition is redundant.

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 5:12 p.m.
Duke said:

Errrm, that's a New Edge, not an SN95

Pete. (l33t FS)
Pete. (l33t FS) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/3/23 5:13 p.m.
NickD said:
Duke said:

Errrm, that's a New Edge, not an SN95

Those are SN95s.

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 5:25 p.m.
Pete. (l33t FS) said:
NickD said:
Duke said:

Errrm, that's a New Edge, not an SN95

Those are SN95s.

Any time I've spoken to them, Mustang folks are always real particular about "It's a New Edge, not an SN-95". I guess they want to distance the (cool) '99-04 models from the (fugly) '94-'98s.

Jesse Ransom
Jesse Ransom GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
2/3/23 5:33 p.m.

In reply to NickD :

These must be the same folks who decided "old body style" was a good way to distinguish eras on a vehicle that's spanned a lot of the last century and a dozen generations. It's an awesome counterpoint. "We messed up being too vague on that last naming thing. This time let's say that only half the things that define this group are in this group."

Beer Baron
Beer Baron MegaDork
2/3/23 5:33 p.m.
NickD said:

Any time I've spoken to them, Mustang folks are always real particular about "It's a New Edge, not an SN-95". I guess they want to distance the (cool) '99-04 models from the (fugly) '94-'98s.

"If you say so. You're the edgelord, not me!"

Apexcarver
Apexcarver UltimaDork
2/3/23 5:36 p.m.

In reply to NickD :

I mean, I'm biased, but I like the 94-98 better...

There's crossover as the underpinnings are the same, even compared to the slightly different foxbody, so I've seen it both ways.

barefootcyborg5000
barefootcyborg5000 PowerDork
2/3/23 5:36 p.m.
Beer Baron said:
NickD said:

Any time I've spoken to them, Mustang folks are always real particular about "It's a New Edge, not an SN-95". I guess they want to distance the (cool) '99-04 models from the (fugly) '94-'98s.

"If you say so. You're the newedgelord, not me!"

ftfy

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 5:42 p.m.
Jesse Ransom said:

In reply to NickD :

These must be the same folks who decided "old body style" was a good way to distinguish eras on a vehicle that's spanned a lot of the last century and a dozen generations. It's an awesome counterpoint. "We messed up being too vague on that last naming thing. This time let's say that only half the things that define this group are in this group."

Oh god, the Chevy truck guys are the worst "It's a New New New Old New Old Body Style." Seriously, I see them referring to GMT800s as "New Old Body Style"

Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 5:56 p.m.

Pete. (l33t FS)
Pete. (l33t FS) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/3/23 6:02 p.m.
NickD said:
Pete. (l33t FS) said:
NickD said:
Duke said:

Errrm, that's a New Edge, not an SN95

Those are SN95s.

Any time I've spoken to them, Mustang folks are always real particular about "It's a New Edge, not an SN-95". I guess they want to distance the (cool) '99-04 models from the (fugly) '94-'98s.

They're all Fox bodies to me.

 

But some people must have a weird concept of fugly smiley 

I remember seeing in Car Craft in the early-mid 90s that there were three treatments Ford did for the Mustang restyle.  They nicknamed them the Jenner, the Schwarzenegger, and something else (Stallone?)  The Jenner looked like a Probe crossed with a running shoe and wasn't used.  One of the other two was what became the '94.  The other looked a lot like the '99 restyle.

NickD
NickD MegaDork
2/3/23 6:51 p.m.

GCrites80s
GCrites80s Dork
2/3/23 6:54 p.m.
Apexcarver said:

In reply to NickD :

I mean, I'm biased, but I like the 94-98 better...

There's crossover as the underpinnings are the same, even compared to the slightly different foxbody, so I've seen it both ways.

Can't tell 'em from a '79 from underneath! I suppose you could look at the exhaust or the transmission. 8.8 vs. 7.5 maybe

Pete. (l33t FS)
Pete. (l33t FS) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/3/23 6:55 p.m.
GCrites80s said:
Apexcarver said:

In reply to NickD :

I mean, I'm biased, but I like the 94-98 better...

There's crossover as the underpinnings are the same, even compared to the slightly different foxbody, so I've seen it both ways.

Can't tell 'em from a '79 from underneath! I suppose you could look at the exhaust or the transmission. 8.8 vs. 7.5 maybe

They got better front suspension geometry in '94 as well as much much better front wheel bearings and separate rotors... before that people were hunting down '83 Continental front knuckles because they had the best geometry for road racing.

 

People really call New Edge mustangs different just because they look different?  They probably think every new model year in the 50s and 60s was a new generation, the styling changed every year back then

Mr_Asa
Mr_Asa UltimaDork
2/3/23 7:20 p.m.

Jesse Ransom
Jesse Ransom GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
2/3/23 7:24 p.m.

In reply to NickD :

On the contrary, that's the hat you wear when your dermatologist tells you you're a hat person now, but you don't like baseball caps and most occasions don't really work for your derby. I admittedly don't mind a brewery.

Image result from https://www.europosters.eu/plastic-frame-monty-python-ministry-of-silly-walks-v21470

Duke
Duke MegaDork
2/3/23 7:44 p.m.

Floating Doc (Forum Supporter)
Floating Doc (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
2/3/23 7:52 p.m.

In reply to NickD :

Oh no, don't tell me that the flat cap is going to end up like the fedora, which became the "ironic hipster" hat.

At least I still have this, for the few days when it's cool enough.

1 ... 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 ... 1788

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
FhK7MSd5NmTm2Fyo0DQMZTIrVLWIcZACcwNrLRrWwRFqrdj2V8RbShBVbaHxqMBG