Flight Service wrote: In a humorous twist, 100% of the admitted Fox News watchers can't follow directions. LOL
In an even more humorous twist, turns out your Mom loves the BBC.
Flight Service wrote: In a humorous twist, 100% of the admitted Fox News watchers can't follow directions. LOL
In an even more humorous twist, turns out your Mom loves the BBC.
News.Google.com and npr
NPR; less yelling, more content, and fewer boner pill commercials. I really enjoy reading the New York Times, but in paper form.
I also read a few industry newsletters; Produce News Daily, The Packer, United Fresh, and Morning News Beat.
The Packer? That doesn't sound like a news channel...LOL
Rimshot.jpg
Flight Service wrote: In a humorous twist, 100% of the admitted Fox News watchers can't follow directions. LOL
Dude, the moron is strong in you tonight.
Please go back to posting on the GGA thread. You know, a place you can make a worthy contribution.
Mkay?
Daily show/Colbert report. Yeah it's Comedy Central, yeah they claim to be #1 in fake news, but it makes me laugh. Like the onion.
NPR (which includes BBCWN) is my first choice. Remarkably unbiased and factual.
shortwave radio 
I tend to just ignore the lies and bullE36 M3 shows and get everything second hand from people who's bias' I have good understanding of, makes filtering the small amount of information out a lot easier.
Kenny_McCormic wrote: I tend to just ignore the lies and bullE36 M3 shows and get everything second hand from people who's bias' I have good understanding of, makes filtering the small amount of information out a lot easier.
Why didn't you just say GRM, that's obviously what you meant.
fasted58 wrote: shortwave radio
No. That's where I get my flamenco music so I can dance in the shower.
one two cha cha cha
I'm a longtime NPR listener and supporter, and while they do a decent job, calling them unbiased is more than a little stretch. Some of their "human interest" pieces literally make me gag.
I really do enjoy their classical music, though.
oldsaw wrote:Flight Service wrote: In a humorous twist, 100% of the admitted Fox News watchers can't follow directions. LOLDude, the moron is strong in you tonight.
LOL you make me laugh. When I posted that comment there were clear instructions in the OP. FoxNews had ZERO +1s ZERO. Yet had 5 comments stating they were FoxNews watchers.
As I said can't follow directions.
In reply to Flight Service:
I wasn't referring to others' inability to follow instructions. Rather, it's the general tone you have ASSumed in a couple of threads.
The nervous, well paid, midwestern white guys I work with.
oldsaw wrote: In reply to Flight Service: I wasn't referring to others' inability to follow instructions. Rather, it's the general tone you have ASSumed in a couple of threads.
Oh you are cross thread trolling.
Carry on then.
As long as the collective name calling of my mother and various perversions that she must enjoy continues. Because if I say something about them, or retaliate in anyway I know I will be the one who gets called down.
I generally just make it up.
I get my news from Wally
In reply to Wally:
Hey, that seems to work well enough for 99.9% of the news agencies.
I'm surprised al jazeera isn't listed(they're better than CNN)
I also get my news only from Ron Burgundy.
yamaha wrote: I'm surprised al jazeera isn't listed(they're better than CNN)
Al Jazeera seems to be a pretty impressive operation. Probably something to do with massive funding. But they don't seem nearly so craven and sad as most of the media sources (notice I didn't use the word "news" there) that are based in the USA. BBC World seems pretty good as well.
Cnn.com usatoday.com economist.com racer.com http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum
In reply to pres589:
They seem to have missed the memos passed around in the US......."Guilt trip the public" and "Bad news gets more ratings"
In reply to yamaha:
Well, jingoistic nervous dingbats are probably pretty easily separated from their cash, and who doesn't love a good horse race (even when some of the horses aren't actually there)?
In reply to pres589:
did you just type?
You'll need to log in to post.
