Did OHSHA have in inspector witnessing or did they research it at home?
Safe Sex Charles Oliver | July 18, 2011
California's Division of Occupational Safety and Health has fined Hustler Video $14,175 for not using condoms in pornographic videos it produced. Another production company, Forsaken Films, was fined $12,150 for not providing condoms to performers.
http://reason.com/brickbat/2011/07/18/safe-sex
Whores have rights too
Cone_Junky wrote: Whores have rights too
this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
^ and the point to KATYB^ 
Who cares?
They are adults, performing a job of their own volition, if they choose to risk their health and safety in that manner, I see it as their right to do so.
KATYB wrote: this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
That's awfully sexist of you to assume I meant only the women are whores
heh.. in my other thread I allude to being a union stage hand.. we all call ourselves "whores" as we go to work for whomever will pay us.
KATYB wrote: this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
Not sure what CJ meant but I would consider the male porn stars to be whores as well...
Cone_Junky wrote: That's awfully sexist of you to assume I meant only the women are whores
Lock vs key my friend, lock vs key.
KATYB wrote: this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
Not that I wanna poke the bear, because I'll freely admit I read that comment and assume it connotated a woman, but who's to say he wasn't referring to the guys? There was no mention of the sex of the whore in question.
Don't they have a berkeleyers Union Local #229 who has their backs on this issue? 
They're getting paid for sex, they're hookers, not whores.
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Don't they have a berkeleyers Union Local #229 who has their backs on this issue?
You'd think they'd have to. Otherwise you'd have scabs like me who'd do their job for FREE!
I think that local#69 represents them in the San Fernando Valley
poopshovel wrote:Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Don't they have a berkeleyers Union Local #229 who has their backs on this issue?You'd think they'd have to. Otherwise you'd have scabs like me who'd do their job for FREE!
I don't think many people would watch their movies if they had scabs.
Hmmm, I think Hookers go out and look for it. Whores wait for it to come to them.
A Hooker is a kind of Airborn, of Mobile Infantry version of a Whore.
KATYB wrote: this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
While I take your point, I don't think "whore" is necessarily defined as "female"...
16vCorey wrote:poopshovel wrote:I don't think many people would watch their movies if they had scabs.Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Don't they have a berkeleyers Union Local #229 who has their backs on this issue?You'd think they'd have to. Otherwise you'd have scabs like me who'd do their job for FREE!
^ Eew.
KATYB wrote: this really surprises me honestly. however whores have rights? wth why is it no one ever gets on the guy for doing porn but the girl is a whore... wholey double standard.
A key that can open many locks is a "masterkey." A lock that is opened by many keys is a "E36 M3ty lock."
Think about it.
It is easy to assume that a remark that puts one class of people down is referring to women, as that happens daily and appears to be socially acceptable in a lot of cases. Merriam-Webster lists the definition for Whore as:
1: a woman who engages in sexual acts for money : prostitute; also : a promiscuous or immoral woman
2: a male who engages in sexual acts for money
Note the bolded section does not carry over to the description of the males as promiscuous or immoral.
Gives something to ponder, eh?
Yes, there is a double standard in this world. How dare you question it? BAD GIRL!!!
I think the bold section is assumed in all men.
It's all about where you get your info/opinion from-
whore (hôr, hr) n.
A prostitute.
A person considered sexually promiscuous.
A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.
intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores
To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
To compromise one's principles for personal gain.
I define it as either male or female. If you choose to only believe it's women, then that's your worldly view that should be questioned.
I choose to not stand by and let someone ELSE assume that it means only women. That is all. 
The word "whore" applies to both genders, only because too few know about the word "gigolo".
You'll need to log in to post.
