Jerry From LA wrote: Also, "White Supremicist Loses Fight" is no surprise to anyone. They've been losing fights since 1863.
you don't really think the civil war was about slavery do you?
Jerry From LA wrote: Also, "White Supremicist Loses Fight" is no surprise to anyone. They've been losing fights since 1863.
you don't really think the civil war was about slavery do you?
ALERT
pitbull113 wrote:Jerry From LA wrote: Also, "White Supremicist Loses Fight" is no surprise to anyone. They've been losing fights since 1863.you don't really think the civil war was about slavery do you?
History is written by the winners. As long as they lost it can be about whatever we want to teach the kids. Maybe they stuck the jelly knife in the peanut butter
nono.. the peanut butter knife in the jelly!
novaderrik wrote:93EXCivic wrote: I hope the guy teabagged the shiny happy person after knocking him out.and then offered to help him up and buy him a drink.. you know, just to make the guy feel even more stupid.
And then tipped the bartender. That would shatter some stereotypes.
joey48442 wrote:Jerry From LA wrote: Also, "White Supremicist Loses Fight" is no surprise to anyone. They've been losing fights since 1863.Haha! I always call the Confederate flag the "hay! We lost 150 years ago" flag. Joey
Heh, and every time I hear Skynyrd's The South's Gonna Do It Again I think to myself, "What, get your asses kicked down the block again?"
mad_machine wrote: nono.. the peanut butter knife in the jelly!
Sweet jesus. Have they no boundaries whatsoever? berkeleying savages.
Otto Maddox wrote:
Is that a Heterosomata, sometimes classified as a suborder of Perciformes?
In reply to Giant Purple Snorklewacker:
Shut up.
Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to Giant Purple Snorklewacker: Shut up.
That isn't very nice.
Plane takes off in 45... you will get 5hrs of peace soon enough.
pitbull113 wrote:Jerry From LA wrote: Also, "White Supremicist Loses Fight" is no surprise to anyone. They've been losing fights since 1863.you don't really think the civil war was about slavery do you?
1863 was the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation. That's what I was talking about. It was the beginning of the end for a way of life that ultimately would have destroyed the South had it continued.
Sad thing is that loser probably has multiple children to teach idiotic thinking to.
mad_machine wrote: nono.. the peanut butter knife in the jelly!
And, again, Jam and Creme Cheese gets no mention, no respect....
Jerry From LA wrote: 1863 was the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation.
You're not suggesting that the Emancipation Proclomation had anything to do with slavery are you? What kind of revisionist history is this?! Why, next you'll try to tell me that our Founding Fathers denied women the right to vote!
Oh, and HITLER said the South was right!
fast_eddie_72 wrote:Jerry From LA wrote: 1863 was the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation.You're not suggesting that the Emancipation Proclomation had anything to do with slavery are you? What kind of revisionist history is this?! Why, next you'll try to tell me that our Founding Fathers denied women the right to vote! Oh, and HITLER said the South was right!
i don't think they specifically denied women the right to vote- they just didn't specifically say they could do it..
You're not suggesting that suffrage has anything to do with the right to vote are you?! It's a STATES RIGHTS issue! If Nevada doesn't want women to vote, who is the Federal Government to tell them they're wrong? Has nothing to do with women's rights! Where does it say in the Constitution that we have to let women vote? IT'S NOT IN THERE! Just a bunch of activist judges... and legislators saying we have to do it. If it was important, the founding fathers would have put it in there! Everyone knows that!
This is probably the exact conversation the dudes in the article had before punches were thrown.
http://www.kontraband.com/videos/12474/Help-End-Womens-Suffrage/
My 2 cents on suffrage
You'll need to log in to post.
