skierd
skierd Dork
5/9/12 1:26 a.m.

Doing my normal day-off routine of laying around the house till noon **C then going for a short ride in and around town, I stopped by the local Suzuki/Yamaha dealer in search of a new helmet and other time killers. Looking around the back lot, I caught a glimpse of chrome out of the corner of my eye...

Dealer says its there as a consignment sale, and all they know is its a 2002 Moto Guzzi California. Its obviously been cough 'customized' by its previous owner.

From what little I know about the California models, they're 1100cc's of transverse v-twin goodness with about 75hp, 560 pounds wet, and shaft drive. Its about the size of a H-D Dyna, but weighs about the same as a sportster, and can actually handle. They normally come with floorboards and linked brakes on the upmarket versions, a dual seat, and possibly/probably a windshield, turn signals, different fenders, possibly factory hard bags. It looks like the PO ditched the floorboards in favor of forward controls, a single seat, and lopped off the slip-ons for something aftermarket, and got rid of the airbox for a pair of K&N pod filters.

They let me test ride it and I came back thinking I really really liked it. Torque is a wonderful, wonderful thing to have. It wasn't loud at all and the motor sounded fantastic through the slightly opened up pipes. There were some fueling issues rolling off a closed throttle, but I'm guessing the pipes and no-airbox have something to do with that. Once moving it pulled really really well, rev'd smoothly and happily with gobs of torque everywhere. I could easily see this motor giving no berkeleys how much I loaded down the bike with gear.

The riding position was new to me as I've never ridden a bike with forward controls. I was pleasantly surprised at how comfortable I was once I relaxed and let myself fall into the position the bike dictated rather than trying to impose the dual-sport 'sit up and beg' riding position I've become so accustomed to. The controls were a bit too far forward for me though, as the top of the shin guard on my boots were resting on the cylinders. Fortunately it looks like it would be relatively simple to relocate the foot pegs.

It was hard to evaluate the handling and ride of the Guzzi given the midwestern flavor of the roads in and around the part of Fairbanks where I was test riding it i.e. straight and flat. Ride quality felt good enough to me, not any worse than the WR anyway. Handling was obviously slower, but not at all cumbersome even during a tight u-turn. I'd really have to take it out for some miles to get a better feel for it.

In the end I came away extremely impressed. Its a rat bike, its relatively cheap, and it 'should' be relatively maintenance free. Its certainly better suited to living out of and off of than my WR250X is, especially if I continue chasing the sun for a living over settling down. Should I?

EvanB
EvanB GRM+ Memberand UltraDork
5/9/12 1:31 a.m.

It's a wonderful engine...and they last forever. If it really only has 11k miles that is barely broken in. You can fit a power commander or MyECU (http://www.cajinnovations.com/MyECU/index.htm) on it to take care of the fueling issues.

stuart in mn
stuart in mn UberDork
5/9/12 9:07 a.m.

Boy, I can't wait for that whole diamond plate aluminum fad to go away.

Xceler8x
Xceler8x GRM+ Memberand UltraDork
5/9/12 9:42 a.m.

Guzzi's do handle really well. I like the looks of that one. Are you buying it?

skierd
skierd Dork
5/9/12 1:22 p.m.

Thinking about it, depends if the seller is willing to come down off his way too high price or not.

wlkelley3
wlkelley3 Dork
5/9/12 9:15 p.m.

Always liked Guzzi's and would like to have one, no matter what the Harley guys at work think. Comfortable cruisers and generally reliable. A few un-modding should fix the issues. Move the pegs to a more comfortable location like you said, I kinda like the footboard and would go back to those. The transverse V engine is cool but can interfere with leg position, which is why footboards are more comfortable on those. Prefer a bit more pull back on the handlebars, would make long distance cruising more comfortable but easy fix. That diamond plate gotta go for my tastes. If reasonable price than go fer it.

foxtrapper
foxtrapper UberDork
5/10/12 8:23 a.m.
skierd wrote: ...I really really liked it...I came away extremely impressed....its relatively cheap

Is there actually a question?

stroker
stroker Dork
5/13/12 8:26 a.m.

So did you buy it?

skierd
skierd Dork
5/14/12 2:28 a.m.

I made an offer, after checking out a few things brought up by the guys over on WildGuzzi. Found its actually a 2003, which was the first year for hydraulic valves. There was a recall on the cam, the clutch, and the lower triple clamp. I was able to check that the clutch recall had been done visually, and this bike has the correct clutch. Waiting to hear back from Moto International (big Guzzi shop in Seattle, one of the best in the US) on whether or not the other recalls were done on it and waiting to hear if the seller takes my offer.

So long as the recalls have been done, I'm actually excited that its a hydro motor. Should make it a near maintenance free motorcycle (basically change the oil in the engine, transmission, and final drive every couple thousand miles and keep good tires on it). As an added plus imo, Guzzi recommends good common easy to find 5w40 oil for the hydro motors instead of the pricey, harder to find 10w60 on the screw adjuster motors. Altogether this should make for a great bike to effectively live off of for the next couple years as I continue moving around with the seasons.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
npBfPVb7XSN4llguudN8Gj98C9oFdIlvN2YpSG5PzM6xDww1ETBRdGxbNnVIrKJE