What I have:
'88 Accord LX-i, broken in a few unimportant ways, but driving daily and pretty much enjoying it. It's quick enough with only 120 hp and 2600 lb, it's got loads of utility because of the hatch and clever fold down, tool-less removal of the seat backs. I put an assembled wheelbarrow in the back, and have routinely hauled small amounts of eight-foot lumber.
What's the rub?
It's broken, which is annoying, but more because I just don't have a ton of time to devote to a daily driver, but really that's not the issue. The issue is my wife. She won't drive it. Likely, she won't drive anything I own, so what that means is that I need to have a real five seater. Two doors are acceptable, but this thing is cramped as a five seater. I do it, but I don't like it. It takes ten real minutes to buckle/unbuckle all of the kiddos, and despite they fact that they think it's the fastest car on the planet (it's not), it's really crowded for their feet.
What I want which is different than the Accord: Better seating for everyone (my seat is uncomfortable also), available parts supply (lots of NLA stuff on this car).
What I want the same as the Accord: Zingy, small to drive, good fuel economy (30 roughly on a normal tank), good cargo capability (not the same time as kid carrying capacity), low operating costs.
So, runs 12.0 in the 1/4, 35 mpg, can fit a couch or four kids, costs $5K, never breaks. Got it?
Let's stick with 5K, I am thinking towards an xB, older Fit, breadvan Si, manual Cube, Mazda 3, Mazda 2, Fiesta.
Special stuff is fun, hence the Si, I don't thing the Fiesta ST is anywhere near that price point yet. Can you make the xB handle? It's probably better than the Accord already, and they are cheap and cool. The tC is a hatch, what's the rear seat like? Doesn't everyone here hate them? What's the difference between the xB and the xD?
I wish the Fiat 500 had five seats, those things are cheap and the cabrio is really cool.
What's the hive's current opinion on this?