alfadriver said:
On the other hand, if the Merc motor is that bad, then the Mercedes chassis must be amazing.
I know it's rude to say I told you so, but I've been saying that for a year or more.
Comparison, speculation and factoring in the last two years, since we were supposed to get the new stuff last year:
Ferrari had a year of development, because they knew they were third at absolutely best last couple of years, so why bother. Plus, two young, talented drivers.
Mercedes probably wanted to win the entire era, so maybe didn't put as much effort into the new car as they could have. Plus, winning the constructors leaves them heavily penalized in wind tunnel time.
Haas spent exactly nothing on last year's (2 years) cars, so they should have made some progress. Plus losing the Russian and the big power from Ferrari has to be good news.
Alfa, pretty much the same story as Haas. And Bottas, other than being incapable of making a good start, is a good driver, with a ton of laps under his belt.
Red Bull seems to have hit the happy aero zone, Max is rocket fast, and if this weekends reliability is an aberration, they are good. Based on Merc catching them up last year, I bet they spent the second half of the season on this year's car.
Williams has a whole lotta room to improve. Our rich Canadian is a fair shoe at best, and Albon has potential, but also had a year off. And Merc power...or lack thereof
Maclaren has missed something badly, and Merc power.
Aston Martin, hard to say. Merc power, missing #1 driver, but they should have had a bunch of development last year that didn't seem to take. Realistically, though, it's a pretty new team.
I'd have thought Alpha Tauri would have been stronger out of the box.
Alpine Point India should have had some good development time last year, but having no customer engines must be a bit tough. Two good drivers, though.
I bet today's running order is pretty stable through the year, although Merc is probably one aero change, and a bit more boost away from being in the mix.