Ian F wrote: So if the cards are a necessary evil, why were they absent from this issue? Was it a decision or a printing "oops"?
We're switching fulfillment houses. On the consumer end, you guys shouldn't notice much of a difference. Any difference should be positive, actually (Better timing of notices. More/better options for renewing, etc). We just sort of outgrew our old place.
In reply to Ian F:
It's part of an elaborate April Fools prank. Next issue is going to be hidden in an exploding bag of subscription cards.
Where does God fit in?
I like the stubs; good bookmarks, decent coasters for sweaty glasses and not a bad little airplane.
JG Pasterjak wrote:Ian F wrote: So if the cards are a necessary evil, why were they absent from this issue? Was it a decision or a printing "oops"?We're switching fulfillment houses. On the consumer end, you guys shouldn't notice much of a difference. Any difference should be positive, actually (Better timing of notices. More/better options for renewing, etc). We just sort of outgrew our old place.
I shall now refer to these places as "fulfillment houses of ill repute".
The lose cards stuck in the pages aren't what bothered me, it was the ones fastened into the binding that pretty much made the magazine open to that page.
Here is an idea: whatever advertisers you put on the page with the rigid, bound card, charge them double, because everybody is going to have to look at their ad in order to tear the subscription card out.
Weirdly enough, advertisers hate to share a spread with a bind-in. I prefer them, though, because they don't turn into instant litter.
Margie
You'll need to log in to post.
