crankwalk (Forum Supporter) said:David S. Wallens said:Just thinking out loud, but is there a market for a stripped-down, rear-drive GT-R?
GTRs AWD traction for the streets and big power has been what has drawn people to them (the last 30 years at least).Even heavy and fully loaded inside they are super fast. AWD is the Pandora's box of drivetrains for GTRs. it distinguished itself as that being a hallmark feature over Supra's, 300zxs , etc in they heyday where it really cemented it's legacy.
Also how much would realistically be saved with fewer bells and whistles and RWD? $20k? So it's $95k instead of $115k. Do people buying $100k cars want to save on halogens instead of HIDs, no sun roof, etc? I'm thinking they want all the GTR myth embodies or nothing.
Along the same vein, how many 4 cylinder Supra's have sold? (I have no idea) Me personally for that price difference, if I wanted a Supra or a GTR I'd want the real deal top of the line version.
This. Everyone champions for a stripped-down, decontented, budget version of a car and then they come out sell terrible.
And 4-cylinder Supra production accounts for a whopping 15% of sales, from what Car & Driver says.