bigben said:David S. Wallens said:It's a neat idea--totally neat. It's the logistics that would need to be figured out.
And it would be a lot more dependant on the integrity of the competitors.
I'm not sure that is the case. Depends on how it is set up.
The Challenge is very dependent on the integrity of the competitors already. But the "real" Challenge is also tempered by the fact that no one at the event wants to look like "That Guy", so no one issues protests. We all know when we are looking at a fraud- so far none of them have placed high, so it has been a mute point.
I think a virtual Challenge should have a component where the participants in the "real" Challenge have input- because they are the ones that witnessed the actual event (and can therefore offer comparisons). I think it would be the "Concours" part- it essentially becomes a "Competitor's Choice" voting process, or some such thing.
If that's the case, the virtual competitor would have to convince the "real" competitors- and if they sniff a fraud, the virtual competitor will essentially be voted off the island.
It would be a different kind of integrity check, but still somewhat effective (and perhaps a little better)