Bumboclot wrote:
"It's only a model."
My boss on a coworker's bench. Yeah, we all autocross.
bigdaddylee82 wrote: The Double Barrel 45 DOES Exist and IS Now Shipping
stupid question here but why?
Flight Service wrote: stupid question here but why?
Flight Service wrote:bigdaddylee82 wrote: The Double Barrel 45 DOES Exist and IS Now Shippingstupid question here but why?
I'd own one just cuz. I like collecting unusual weapons. My collection is small, but I like that stuff. I gurantee I have a couple of friends who will order one. LOL
There's one of these on the side of the road on the way to my parent's house from mine. Flat black with red wheels, not my style, but I pointed it out to SWMBO the other day and she wasn't instantly disgusted. I asked if she wanted to stop and look, she said, "maybe next time through," She didn't say NO! Hmm...
I like the looks of the notchback better personally, but this would still be fun and different. Day dreaming, I don't even know what they're asking for it, nor do I have space for it.
Had one of those back in the day. Liked it, would probably like another one.
914Driver wrote:
Where's the barf emoticon when you need it. That kind of ugly doesn't wash out.
In reply to Swank Force One:
I like that strut tower brace design a lot. Someone thought hard about where to take all the flex out.
pic unrelated:
I like how it seems to tie into the bracket thing on the throttle body.
In reply to Swank Force One:
I was puzzling over that a bit... Unless there are bellows or something between there and the engine in the intake tract, seems like asking for trouble. Even if the engine's solidly mounted, those are parts far enough apart as to make me wonder whether chassis flex will be trying to yank on intake ancillaries in an unpleasant way... Or maybe that's all really stout and they're using it structurally
I had a moment of terror before image searching "stressed member"
Swank Force One wrote:
I hope, for the intake manifolds sake, it has solid motor mounts.
Edit: Twice in one hour I should have looked at the post above mine.
ransom wrote: In reply to Swank Force One: I was puzzling over that a bit... Unless there are bellows or something between there and the engine in the intake tract, seems like asking for trouble. Even if the engine's solidly mounted, those are parts far enough apart as to make me wonder whether chassis flex will be trying to yank on intake ancillaries in an unpleasant way... Or maybe that's all really stout and they're using it structurally
Probably structural.
It's this car:
This motor.
LOL WUT.
93EXCivic wrote: All the good parts of the US are left off that except Missisippi. It just sucks.
Hey! No fair dragging Mississippi into this fight. This after I sided with Ohio sucks.
Indiana sucks and it's next to Ohio so Ohio sucks too.
Mississippi is awesome and it's next to Louisiana so Louisiana is awesome.
Ok maybe I'm exaggerating a little. But it isn't all bad, just a bad wrap. So bad they had an ad campaign to try and fix the stereotype.
http://www.businessinsider.com/mississippi-actually-had-an-ad-campaign-working-to-fix-its-reputation-as-the-worst-state-2013-5
Swank Force One wrote:
This Smokey Nagatas v12 erm....4jjzz?
ransom wrote: pic unrelated:
Oh, YASSssss... Nom, Nom, Nom....
You'll need to log in to post.
