CamaroKeith
CamaroKeith New Reader
4/27/09 8:26 p.m.

I'm hoping someone can help here. I'm drawing a complete blank as to why you get this answer:

1/2[1/(s-b)] + 1/2[1/(s+b)] = 1/2[(2s)/(s^2-b^2)] = s/(s^2-b^2)

I'm good with the denominator but for the life of me I can't rationalize why you get "s" in the numerator.

Any help is appreciated.

-Keith

Hal
Hal HalfDork
4/27/09 8:37 p.m.

Probably all wrong since the last math class I took was in 1963.

1/2 of 2s = s

confuZion3
confuZion3 Dork
4/27/09 8:37 p.m.

Alrighty then. I'll see if I can help you out with this.

NONACK
NONACK New Reader
4/27/09 8:43 p.m.

Hal is right. What you get is 2s/2(s^2-b^2), then 2 cancels out, leaving you with s/(s^2-b^2)

EDIT: See below post for intelligent, useful answer.

confuZion3
confuZion3 Dork
4/27/09 8:50 p.m.

You multiply the whole thing by S/S (which = 1). That's how you get it in the numerator. Right?

He wants to know how you come about with S in the numerator to begin with.

CamaroKeith
CamaroKeith New Reader
4/27/09 9:05 p.m.
confuZion3 wrote: You multiply the whole thing by S/S (which = 1). That's how you get it in the numerator. Right?

Actually you have to multiply the 2 denominators together:

(s+b)(s-b) = s^2-sb + bs - b^2 = s^2 - b^2

I can't remember what you do to the numerators tho and how you wind up with 2s

mith612
mith612 New Reader
4/27/09 9:16 p.m.

The idea is you can multiply any one part of an equation by 1 and it doesn't change the equation.

In this case you multiply 1/2(s-b) by (s+b)/(s+b) and 1/2(s+b) by (s-b)/(s-b)

you now have (s+b)/2(s^2 - b^2) + (s-b)/2(s^2 - b^2)

which is the same as (s+b+s-b)/2(s^2 - b^2)

you can probably get it from there

CamaroKeith
CamaroKeith New Reader
4/27/09 9:19 p.m.

Okay, I figured it out, I think.......

when you multiply the denom of the one you have to multiply the num of that one also thus you wind up with....

[(s+b)/s^2-b^2] + [(s-b)/s^2-b^2] = (s+b+s-b)/(s^2-b^2)

The b terms in the num cancel and you are left with 2s/s^2-b^2

I think that's how it works.

Like I said, my nerves are just getting frazzled

mith612
mith612 New Reader
4/27/09 9:21 p.m.

Bingo, you got it.

CamaroKeith
CamaroKeith New Reader
4/27/09 9:22 p.m.
mith612 wrote: The idea is you can multiply any one part of an equation by 1 and it doesn't change the equation. In this case you multiply 1/2(s-b) by (s+b)/(s+b) and 1/2(s+b) by (s-b)/(s-b) you now have (s+b)/2(s^2 - b^2) + (s-b)/2(s^2 - b^2) which is the same as (s+b+s-b)/2(s^2 - b^2) you can probably get it from there

Yep. Thanks. For the life of me could not think of this.

Grtechguy
Grtechguy SuperDork
4/27/09 9:37 p.m.

yeah....................

aussiesmg
aussiesmg Dork
4/27/09 9:43 p.m.

42..........oh wait

confuZion3
confuZion3 Dork
4/27/09 11:38 p.m.

Miata. Isn't the answer Miata? Or E30? That's kind of a number.

thatsnowinnebago
thatsnowinnebago GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
4/28/09 12:56 a.m.

P71!!

spin_out
spin_out New Reader
4/28/09 12:23 p.m.

Oooo Math fun. Can we have another?

billy3esq
billy3esq Dork
4/28/09 2:40 p.m.

I think this problem was mostly bs.

I can't believe I was first with that line.

John Brown
John Brown GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
4/28/09 2:48 p.m.

Morons.

The answer is Mx5

CamaroKeith
CamaroKeith New Reader
4/30/09 9:54 p.m.
billy3esq wrote: I think this problem was mostly bs. I can't believe I was first with that line.

Actually, differential equations is bs

EricM
EricM HalfDork
5/1/09 10:31 a.m.
CamaroKeith wrote:
billy3esq wrote: I think this problem was mostly bs. I can't believe I was first with that line.
Actually, differential equations is bs

(N-M) (M-N) What is so hard about that?

I loved DifeScrew after I ahd to take Transfermation of Linear Maticies.

pinchvalve
pinchvalve GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
5/1/09 10:39 a.m.

Uhhhhh, Miata?

John Brown
John Brown GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
5/1/09 12:39 p.m.

Ketchup

John Brown wrote: Morons. The answer is Mx5

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
ceZClRVyS8y0tpAgR5QgRHp8sKYaVqUoeD77DuVITsMrxuioEH10Uy7XeRXdatfr