Flynlow (FS) said:Duke said:Stop calling women over the age of 18 "girl".
Seriously, just stop.
I don't care how you were raised, and frankly, given your parents, I'm really surprised you were raised that way.
I am 10 years older than you and I know not to do it. So you can learn not to also.
You got me thinking about this, because that sounds like something I would do...but not in any sort of demeaning way. I think it rankles you and others because it's the equivalent of calling someone "boy". As in, "Who do you think you are, boy?" And I agree, that's just being a jerk.
But it's also the equivalent of "guy", as in, "Who's the (guy/girl) over at supplier X that does such a good job?" You could say "woman" in that case, and it would be fine, but weirdly, I wouldn't use "man" in that sentence because it then sounds like, "Who's the man!?!" which is an altogether different sentiment. So I actually had to think about it for a minute for a respectful equivalent of "guy"...all I could come up with was "lady", and the masculine version "lord" would also not be appropriate, "gentleman" would, but oddly formal; "gent" or "lad" isn't used outside the british sphere of influence. Dude/dudette is too informal for a workplace outside of southern california. "Folks" only works in a plural referral.
Pronouns are hard. I usually default to assuming no ill will unless proven otherwise.
What about girlfriend? Mature, comfortably independent, don't need a man, but I make her laugh lady woman friend doesn't have the same vibe.