1 ... 4 5 6 7 8
Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 8:27 a.m.

I will pipe in to say that while I think Executive pay has gotten totally out of hand, there are those who are worth every penny.  Having been in and around Ford for 25 years before I was let go back in March, I think Alan Mullaly was worth every penny and more he was paid.  Bill Ford before him had the decency not to take a paycheck, and he may still have been overpaid.  I still can't fathom why Hollywood Mark Fields was ever given the job, he must have had something on one of the Ford Family as he was out of his depth from the start, even having been groomed for the job for a decade or more.  He should have been required to pay back twice what they paid him.  Jim Hackett I'll wait and see on, but so far I'm wanting a refund.  

Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 8:31 a.m.
mtn said:

[politics warning]

And on the other end of it, why should we have a minimum wage as high as it is when you consider that everything we buy is made in China and a kid was paid $4 for the entire day to make it? The Trump Tariffs I believe are a GOOD thing, but unfortunately they were implemented by a ham-fisted toddler of a Cheeto. 

[end of the political statement]

Because if we paid people a living wage maybe they wouldn't need to buy such crap.

More seriously, it's those same companies betting ludicrous handouts and assistance from the government, and paying their top execs (in many cases total compensation over $40m a year) that are padding the profits, and thus their pockets, by making the choices to buy those Chinese products and making it non viable to make small cheap items here in the USA.  remember the uproar when that well known socialist pinko Henry Ford started paying people $5 a day and created what we now know as the middle class? 

mtn
mtn MegaDork
10/10/19 8:40 a.m.
Adrian_Thompson said:
mtn said:

[politics warning]

And on the other end of it, why should we have a minimum wage as high as it is when you consider that everything we buy is made in China and a kid was paid $4 for the entire day to make it? The Trump Tariffs I believe are a GOOD thing, but unfortunately they were implemented by a ham-fisted toddler of a Cheeto. 

[end of the political statement]

Because if we paid people a living wage maybe they wouldn't need to buy such crap.

 

But they still would. I guarantee it. If it is available, they'll buy the cheaper item every time - especially when you consider that the quality is very similar. 

 

(agree with your second part of the post that I removed) 

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
10/10/19 8:45 a.m.

You guys are getting very close to bottom-dwelling fish. laugh

Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 8:48 a.m.
z31maniac said:

You guys are getting very close to bottom-dwelling fish. laugh

I'm backing off, no more mention of minimum wage or CEO salaries.  

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 9:01 a.m.

Because if we paid people a living wage maybe they wouldn't need to buy such crap.

More seriously, it's those same companies betting ludicrous handouts and assistance from the government, and paying their top execs (in many cases total compensation over $40m a year) that are padding the profits, and thus their pockets, by making the choices to buy those Chinese products and making it non viable to make small cheap items here in the USA.  remember the uproar when that well known socialist pinko Henry Ford started paying people $5 a day and created what we now know as the middle class? 

Times were different.  Ford paid that to attract good talent to make cars in the USA.  Nowadays they simply ship the factories off overseas.  Ford didn't really have that option back then.

For the record, I'm against welfare- regardless of who it goes to.  But it seems as though bribing giant companies to build their factories somewhere in particular, at the potential expense of smaller companies, is more pernicious than sending off a few hundred bucks a week to someone who can't or won't hold down a full time job.  

Sorry if this flounders anyone, please discuss with civility.  

Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 10:23 a.m.

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

Wallmart and co could pay decent money as well.  They've shipped the production off shore, but they still have brick and morter stores selling things here.  The only reason they can pay such low wages is a) the law allows them and b) they want too.  

frenchyd
frenchyd UberDork
10/10/19 11:11 a.m.
volvoclearinghouse said:

Because if we paid people a living wage maybe they wouldn't need to buy such crap.

More seriously, it's those same companies betting ludicrous handouts and assistance from the government, and paying their top execs (in many cases total compensation over $40m a year) that are padding the profits, and thus their pockets, by making the choices to buy those Chinese products and making it non viable to make small cheap items here in the USA.  remember the uproar when that well known socialist pinko Henry Ford started paying people $5 a day and created what we now know as the middle class? 

Times were different.  Ford paid that to attract good talent to make cars in the USA.  Nowadays they simply ship the factories off overseas.  Ford didn't really have that option back then.

For the record, I'm against welfare- regardless of who it goes to.  But it seems as though bribing giant companies to build their factories somewhere in particular, at the potential expense of smaller companies, is more pernicious than sending off a few hundred bucks a week to someone who can't or won't hold down a full time job.  

Sorry if this flounders anyone, please discuss with civility.  

That is the flaw with capitalism.  Henry Ford attracted the best workers with his $5.00 a day and they made him rich.  

Bill Gates made millionaires out of his employees by sharing part ownership of the company.  

Amazon’s Bezio  became the richest  on the planet  by not paying a living wage and allowing tax payers to subsidize them.  The difference?  We aren’t allowed to say on this site.  

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 11:55 a.m.
Adrian_Thompson said:

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

Wallmart and co could pay decent money as well.  They've shipped the production off shore, but they still have brick and morter stores selling things here.  The only reason they can pay such low wages is a) the law allows them and b) they want too.  

Also, c) people will willingly work for those wages.  

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 11:58 a.m.
frenchyd said:
 

That is the flaw with capitalism.  Henry Ford attracted the best workers with his $5.00 a day and they made him rich.  

Bill Gates made millionaires out of his employees by sharing part ownership of the company.  

Amazon’s Bezio  became the richest  on the planet  by not paying a living wage and allowing tax payers to subsidize them.  The difference?  We aren’t allowed to say on this site.  

You know what the difference is?  

Ford built stuff - cars that became the most popular of their time

Gates developed stuff - software that became the default software in most of the world's computers

Bezos runs a glorified roadside junk stand.  

jharry3
jharry3 GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
10/10/19 12:31 p.m.

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

Bezos just took what Sears-Robuck did with their catalog, improved it by putting a workable internet search engine for a variety of products, and figured out fast delivery.  

Sears really blew it IMO, Bezos took advantage of that error.

Sometimes I get the stuff I order in the morning by that afternoon, or at least before the weekend, which would be the time I would have had to go shopping to get the thing.    

And at least those people he is paying low wages to are working and not on the dole.

Datsun310Guy
Datsun310Guy UltimaDork
10/10/19 12:37 p.m.

In reply to jharry3 :

Sears had the technology and blew it. 
 

 

frenchyd
frenchyd UberDork
10/10/19 12:45 p.m.

In reply to jharry3 :

Oh but they are on the Dole.  When wages paid are below the cost of living, the Public sector picks up the slack. It may be in health care, food stamps, housing assistance, transportation subsidies, etc.  

In fact  tax payers subsidize private industry all the time.  Not just Walmart, Amazon, Sears,  McDonalds etc.  

Even if the parent(s) work two or three jobs to meet living expenses there is a societal cost to that. Children who grow up without parental supervision wind up in trouble  more than 38% of the time.  Legal trouble, family trouble,  educational trouble.  

For every smart kid neglected there will be someone who pays the price.  In Jail, in an unwanted pregnancy,  in an unfulfilled ambition.  

 

 

 

 ambition

Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 12:47 p.m.

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

I feel that's a little disingenuous.  People at the bottom of the employment ladder, and even more so in smaller communities where big box stores have forced smaller concerns and mom and pop shops out of business, have little choice.  It's easy to say let the system define the correct pay, but that doesn't work when the government is subsidizing the business by letting them underpay.  I don't want to argue, I just think you and I see the same circumstances and draw different conclusions on what they mean and how we arrived there.

I'm glad we're all having a civil conversation about such hot button issues.  Go GRM Peeps!

Ian F
Ian F MegaDork
10/10/19 12:49 p.m.

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

Nah... eBay has made billions off being a glorified junk stand.

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 1:10 p.m.
Adrian_Thompson said:

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

I feel that's a little disingenuous.  People at the bottom of the employment ladder, and even more so in smaller communities where big box stores have forced smaller concerns and mom and pop shops out of business, have little choice.  It's easy to say let the system define the correct pay, but that doesn't work when the government is subsidizing the business by letting them underpay.  I don't want to argue, I just think you and I see the same circumstances and draw different conclusions on what they mean and how we arrived there.

I'm glad we're all having a civil conversation about such hot button issues.  Go GRM Peeps!

Boiling down either of our differences to a conversation in between whatever it is we're supposed to be doing is probably missing a lot of points.  I wager some of those things we see eye to eye on.

Those communities where big box stores have pushed the little concerns out of business often (though not always) got there due to, essentially, corporate welfare.  Dangling tax breaks and other incentives in front of big box stores to toss up a 100,000 square foot concrete monolith looks good on the property tax ledger, but can adversely affect smaller stores.  Though I will say, I worked for a couple of mom-and-pop retailers, and their pay wasn't appreciably better than I could have earned at Wal-Mart or similar. 

I think there's blame enough to go around.  Some people pigeon hole themselves into jobs or situations and then whine about it.  I used to know a guy (haven't talked to him in about 2 years or so) who was constantly jumping from one chef job to another.  One time I suggested to him he might do better finding some other line of employment.  He disagreed strongly, and refused to "demean" himself to something he did not feel suited his station in life- cheffing.  The guy was always living paycheck to paycheck and borrowing money.  One time I offered him a paid job to help me with some yard work.  He turned it down.  

Of course, that's an anecdote, and there are people genuinely "job poor" through circumstances outside of their control.  But the more I meet people, and talk to them, the more I feel like most people exert more control over their individual situations than they ever think to leverage- myself included.  What it boils down to seems to be, people are resistant to change.  

Final note: I would not necessarily be opposed to people trying to collectively bargain WalMart, et al for better wages.  It wouldn't even bother me (much) if that raised the price of a gallon jug of Castrol at said WalMart a buck.  And while I don't think the government ought to intervene, I also don't think WalMart should be abe to tell its employees they can't bargain collectively.  

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 1:11 p.m.
Ian F said:

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

Nah... eBay has made billions off being a glorified junk stand.

As far as I'm concerned, there's little difference, other than the fact that I have only successfully used eBay to peddle my personal junk.  

Duke
Duke MegaDork
10/10/19 1:18 p.m.
frenchyd said:

In reply to jharry3 :

Oh but they are on the Dole.  When wages paid are below the cost of living, the Public sector picks up the slack. It may be in health care, food stamps, housing assistance, transportation subsidies, etc.  

In fact  tax payers subsidize private industry all the time.  Not just Walmart, Amazon, Sears,  McDonalds etc.  

Sounds like a reason to end subsidies of all kinds. If the individual social safety net is cut back to temporary / emergency assistance only and we eliminate all corporate subsidies of every kind, the free market everyone on the left loves to hate might actually have a chance to work freely. 

frenchyd
frenchyd UberDork
10/10/19 1:33 p.m.

In reply to Datsun310Guy : It’s not about Sear’s failure. That happens all the time in retail.   

It’s that Bezo took advantage of the tax code to minimize his tax obligation  and invest in a winning strategy.  

No not good for Bezo,  every dollar he failed to pay was made up for by working families that can’t take advantage of tax avoidance schemes.  

America spent the money.  It doesn’t matter if it was on a useless war or weapon  system the Pentagon  doesn’t need but politicians need to get Re-elected  

 

 

Adrian_Thompson
Adrian_Thompson MegaDork
10/10/19 2:05 p.m.

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

We agree on two things!!  

  1. Corporate welfare in the form of stupid tax incentives for business that are already rich should go.
  2. Volvo's rock!

yeswink

Crxpilot
Crxpilot Reader
10/10/19 2:05 p.m.

I'll shake my fist at the cloud and say a lot of millennials I run into don't know how to apologize for their mistakes.  Even in hospitality jobs where customer satisfaction is the bottom line, a forgotten food item, wrong change, a slipped curse word is followed with a straight ahead, soulless stare. 

"Sorry to bug you but I think I'm missing some fries." "Okay."

"I gave you a $20. I think my change is $5 short." "What? Oh, here."

"Could you watch your language?  I have a 9 and 11 year-old in the car." "Whatever." and they point at me while laughing with coworkers.

 

The word they're missing is, "Sorry."  It's never been wrong to say I'm sorry.  I even have to pull it out of my kids like I'm tugging a cruise ship with a rowboat.

Sorry is that magic word that reinforces we're all human.  Forgotten fries is no big deal.  Not being sorry is the start of an avalanche.  Get off your phone, make eye contact, and tell me you're sorry.  I'll probably even tip you for being humble (because that's another endangered trait.)

volvoclearinghouse
volvoclearinghouse PowerDork
10/10/19 2:26 p.m.
Adrian_Thompson said:

In reply to volvoclearinghouse :

We agree on two things!!  

  1. Corporate welfare in the form of stupid tax incentives for business that are already rich should go.
  2. Volvo's rock!

yeswink

See my latest new thread...

infinitenexus
infinitenexus Reader
10/10/19 2:28 p.m.

In reply to Crxpilot :

My personal experiences have been that boomers are the worst when it comes to customer service situations.  I worked at T-mobile selling phones/plans for a while, years ago (surprising amount of money for an easy job, but you have to deal with people) and younger people definitely had a bit of a "whatever" attitude about everything, but it was the older people that were the worst and most entitled.  Again, these are just my experiences.  They would come in with a broken phone and demand a new one for free.  I would tell them that they didn't have insurance and still owed $200 on their phone so they could purchase a new one but that $200 would still have to remain on their plan until it was paid off.  They would scream at me that they'd paid their bill on time every month for three years and they deserve a new phone for free.  I would calmly explain to them that if they had insurance, they would be able to get a new phone for about $5, but they elected not to get insurance so they had to pay the full price for a phone.  One guy even called me a "smug little e36m3" when I told him that.  And this wasn't a one-time deal - at least once every other week a boomer would come in demanding a new phone for free simply because they paid their bill on time.  Or our plans would improve over time, and they would come in and I would say something along the lines of "I see you're on our old plan.  I'll upgrade you to our new one for free.  You'll get twice the data and it won't cost anything extra." and they would sometimes thank me, but roughly half the time they would glare at me and grumble something about me trying to rip them off.  And then there was the super smug ones that come in, demand something while making a point to show they're not paying attention to you but instead just look at their trophy wives or one of the female employees, and when you tell them the total price they just toss a few $100 bills at you - while still essentially ignoring you - and so forth.  Man, I hated those guys.

Of course I think most people will tell you that working nearly any customer service job is a good way to learn that almost everyone out there is awful.

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy MegaDork
10/10/19 3:22 p.m.

An aside, from my personal little life. I always try to remember Sears when I am being difficult about trying a new thing in business.  What other company was in a better position to expand into internet sales than Sears, who made their fortune by selling stuff mail order?

Old thinking, man.  It's hard to make it go away in a  59 year old brain.

frenchyd
frenchyd UberDork
10/10/19 3:30 p.m.

In reply to infinitenexus :

Contact with the public is like that.  I was talking with a police officer and he was convinced the residents of this city were terrible.  The worst.  

I pointed out that our crime rate was only .00103  ( normal is 1.000. ) and a nearby metro area was over 3.000. 

If all you are exposed to is the bad side of someone it’s hard to see the big picture.  

 

1 ... 4 5 6 7 8

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
jzhSOooD4K2NhVW7maDSZzAEEc3TBl6rYlTFRPh5B4EFmEnzIXGtaJ8kBw36PpZB